Monday, 28 February 2011

Before Chernobyl

    I started my the degree in 1982: the year before Chernobyl occurred. In 1983 nuclear power seized on the discredited ideas of global warming to get them new plants.

    They did not do biology serve failed to realise that biology is carbon cycle meant plants and bacteria have been had taken in all man's extra carbon dioxide to support new life on earth.

    Nuclear power got its stooges to propose that mankind was magically increasing concentration of that trace gas in the air. They failed to realise that was the scientific impossibility. The level of carbon dioxide in the air is solely a function of the efficiency of photosynthesis to take in that gas.

    I was taught that electrolysis give off radiation. This was taught for years before the cold fusion idea came about: I would have proposed trying electrodes with platinum or titanium.

    There are better ways to increase the levels are molecular nuclear fusion from water we see here. Adding jelly agar to the water is properly the best way to capitalise the MNF. Running the system under power is another good idea to try.

    For the must be ecstatic, I am trying on other people's work. From 30 years ago. This is why called universities in the world are secretly working on call fusion.

    The release of nuclear radiation from an electoral system, from regular non-radioactive water, has been known about since the 1950s. It should be written up in all their undergraduate chemistry textbooks.

    Why has the science failed to ratify a known fact? Because it was not in the interests of tertiary education to demolish the phantom science of global warming.

    Nature has done a good measure of demolition itself. Man-made climate change says the rising level of carbon dioxide in the air which can never happen. Since the evolution of green plants 650,000,000 years ago.

    So a science already knows how her to do molecular nuclear fusion. It just uses not to let on to the world that this is the case.

    Molecular nuclear fusion financially destroys nuclear fission and even burning fossil fuels: which are overpriced today.

    It goes on from regular water, producing a whiff of helium and oxygen, plus heat and a little low power gamma wave radiation: like the deep sea does. As it does physical and biological MNF.

    Ever since Chernobyl blow up a third of Asia tertiary education has acted as a paid stooge to nuclear power.

    Burning fossil fuels does MNF. The electrolysis of water does it: here we need a gel and to run the system under pressure to do useful levels of nuclear fusion.

Ever since man started using the steam cycle, he has been doing nuclear fusion. I must give thanks to a chemist who devised cold fusion. As this made me realise nuclear fusion happens from compounds of hydrogen.

    It goes on in our heart and arteries as her heart beat. The pressure waves in the blood produce biological, molecular, nuclear fusion in our bodies. 60 or 70 times a minute.

Electrolysis

    I was taught in 1985 that electrolysis of an aqueous solution give out nuclear radiation. We are doing molecular nuclear fusion, turn the water into helium, oxygen, low power gamma wave radiation and heat. So called fusion did work, but is very week.

    If you try to detect the helium you are not going to succeed. Use a Geiger counter with the probe close to the water bath. Then you will detect the nuclear radiation. The whole of science was trying to avoid admitting they had stumbled across nuclear fusion. There was too much nuclear research money tied up in the phantom science of global warming.

    This was so not true. Green plants sink all the available carbon dioxide, so there has been no increase in free carbon dioxide for 200 years. But Harvard University found there has been a 15% increase in crop yields. All the Chemical Engineering funding bodies should snap into attention and find out how molecular nuclear fusion works.

    Rainstorms give out nuclear radiation as they do MNF. When they have built up a whole megawatt potential between the cloud tops and the ground we get a weak down strike, followed by a 1028 up strike through a steam plasma.

    Hot smokers in the sea do MNF by the gentle bubbling of steam into high pressure water. This sets up a steam plasma, which supplies all the energy for local ecosystem. So nature does molecular nuclear fusion using a steam plasma. Wake up chemical engineers. Nature does MNF all around you!

    A beating human heart causes pressure waves in the blood, and that does MNF. So nature does nuclear fusion IN you.

    To get more MNF, run the electrolysis cell under pressure. Or better still, do electrolysis on a watery gel solution. As the hydrogen ions flow towards the negative electrodes they do loads of MNF. We are increasing the interactions of hydrogen nuclei in an electric field. So we do more molecular nuclear fusion.

    This is why heating amounts encased in a gel release more heat for the current applied. Biology and nature are fusion driven. Says man adopted the steam cycle in the 18th century servicemen.

    Nature does not do toxic nuclear fission from uranium. If we want to live, neither should we. All and

Molecular nuclear fusion is safe power

    Biology teaches schoolchildren that green plants sink carbon dioxide. A degree level biologist loans are all biology sinks CO2 down to two parts per 1,000,000.

    The only time this figure rises is during an ice-age. In the little ice-age of the 18th century free CO2 rays to four parts per 1,000,000. Then 200 years ago it fell to two PPM, and has remained static since then.

    Almost 2010 Harvard University put on record that a two year mole search around the world has failed to find any increase in global CO2 in the last 200 years. They had found a 15% increase in crop yields.

    So man's carbon dioxide has increased life on earth but not had any impact on the weather. All the climate change we observe is due to natural solar cycles.

    Since 2003 I have located massive areas of nature where molecular nuclear fusion goes on: turning water into helium, oxygen, gamma wave radiation and heat. The heat release is based on Einstein is relativity equation, so we get 1.5x1024 Watts per gram of hydrogen converted into helium.

    To do nuclear fission from uranium is stupid. It is uneconomic, toxic, polluting and sometimes fatal in the short term and he creates waste which is toxic for hundreds of thousands of years.

    Your beating heart does MNF. So it is safe, clean and free. A steam plasma is how hot-smokers support massive ecosystems in the deep, away from all solar radiation.

    Likewise lightning strikes our steam plasmas: and the most energetic structure years we C on the Earth.

    This idea was suggested to me by Professor Zimmerman talking to me about that fluid turbulence of hydrogen gas. An idea he does not want the world to know about. Can't think why, it is the work of a genius.

    We can convert all nuclear plants are over to steam plasma tubes, rather than metal oxide fission tubes. We produce only heat, light and the same power of gamma waves as your beating heart produces.

    So nearly free, toxic death free power. No carbon dioxide. But life sinks all the available carbon dioxide from the air as I said in paragraph one.

Sunday, 27 February 2011

Nuclear fusion

    In 2001 Dr Zimmerman proposed that hydrogen gas in turbulent flow did nuclear fusion: he did not realise there was a pressure threshold here. Or for the lower limit of turbulence involved. So more work needed to be done. This is 2011; he never has done any work on the idea.

    2001 my PhD got ended for no reason: I was studying the phantom science of global warming. I tell people this was PR by nuclear power, and pressure was applied by the funding agencies (I think) and my PhD ended.

    2007 Oxford University got four billion UK pounds to examine how at hydrogen plasma to do atomic nuclear fusion. A gas plasma creates turbulent flow of a pressurise gas. See paragraph one.

    I did my engineering degree in 1982, and was aware that all man is engine's give out nuclear radiation, and produces helium as they worked. Never did understand why.

    2003 figured it out. Steam in turbulent flow does molecular nuclear fusion:

H2O->He+O+γ+E1    here E1 is given by Einstein's relativity equation, of 1.5x1024 Watts. γ is gamma wave and X ray radiation

    We eight see other forms of MNF. In hydrocarbon, ammonia, ethanol and water distilleries. But the most important form is from water.

    The most important place for MNF is in the deep sea. Were the turbulent flow of sea currents, or the emission of geothermal steam into high pressure sea water does MNF.

    Green plants in the light produce methane, helium, oxygen, gamma wave radiation and heat as they do MNF. Except if we have water stress the methane ends up as carbohydrates.

    Growing bacteria and animal blood systems also do it. As do waterfalls and breaking waves. It is four times as exothermic as toxic nuclear fission from uranium. It produces no toxic waste. You can't make bombs of it either.

    In the 1950s man found that exploding an N bomb in a tank of water released more energy. Man has stumbled on molecular nuclear fusion, but did not realise. The Nazis were experimenting with exploding high explosive devices in water tanks. They discovered the nuclear bomb.

    It worked so well all the staff were vaporised, and no more work was done on the idea. Until the 1950s. By which time mankind knew a little about radioactivity. Enough to know they would get a big bang.

    Man has used MNF since the industrial revolution. But radioactivity was not thought of until Marie Currie won two Nobel prizes, but ended up dying from radiation sickness cause by radium.

    Nuclear fission kills. It is the technology we should not be doing. Nuclear power invented the phantom science of global warming, then renamed it climate change when it was obvious the world was cooling from 2005.

    All the scientists who are never published papers on man-made global warming or climate change have no place in education. They are paid stooges to nuclear power. Who would be happiest if were all dead. Yet we let them educate our children. We should not.

    We can replace all burning of fossil fuels with steam plasma tubes. They turn regular water into heat. With no toxic end product: the oxygen fissions away to light and heat. Green plants produce 18O2, which has such a long half-life it is safer than granite.

    A steam plasma tube can generate the heat and power for a street. Or drive a high performance car from water. With no petrol or diesel oil to burn. And no carbon dioxide production.

    Man-made global warming was devised after Chernobyl. New Scientist has been publishing articles on the definitive proof to carbon dioxide affecting the weather for ¼ century. Yet green plants have taken in all man is carbon dioxide.

    So crop yields have increased by 15% since the industrial revolution, but there is no more carbon dioxide in the free air. In city centres we can see an increase in the local level of CO2. But local levels have no impact on the weather.

    Says the end of the little ice-age global carbon dioxide levels have been static at two parts per 1,000,000, as a result of photosynthesis sinking all man's additional carbon dioxide. There never has been any increase in global CO2 for 200 years.

    All the quasi scientists who have never published work on carbon dioxide and the weather have no place in education: they should return all monies they received for fraudulent work. They owe mankind a massive apology.

    All the academic professionals who ever doubted man-made climate change did not bother to share these reservations with the world. They could have saved us a lot of money and worry.

    The world has now decided carbon dioxide has nothing to do with the weather; and I have always believed that academics have trouble deciding what day of the week it was. If nuclear power resided all their plants are getting new plants of death built with academics, they really should employ better psychiatrist to look into their mental health.

    But anyone who is preferred to work for nuclear power has to have been entry certificate to mental health problems in order to get the job. Car engines work most efficiently at 50 miles per hour. On motorways a constant 70 miles an hour is even more efficient than the star start cycle.

    Any attempt to reduce the speed limit for cars in England will increase petrol burn. And ensure all multinational company will move out of the country. It would not reduce carbon dioxide output, but green plants already sink all the carbon dioxide that we can give them.

More life

    All academic professionals know that the limit to life on earth is available carbon dioxide in the air. Biology converts CO2 into carbohydrates. And it excrete the excess oxygen. Animals breathe in the oxygen and eat the extra carbohydrates.

    So by releasing extra carbon dioxide, mankind has increased life on earth. But there is no more carbon dioxide left in the evening air than there was 200 years ago: as confirmed by Harvard University. So there is no possible effect on the world climate

    Man made climate change is PR fiction by nuclear power and its paid stooges. Only local carbon dioxide levels can increase, and the cities and towns of the world are so small it in the area they have no effect on the global weather.

Basic biology

    On land plants take in carbon dioxide in the light, and converted into methane, helium, excrete oxygen while they produce heat and gamma wave radiation: they do light induced molecular nuclear fusion. This supports all life on earth! Animals breathe in the oxygen combine it with carbohydrates produced from the methane, to get at residual fusion heat.

    Deep sea bacteria years and the turbulent flow of high pressure water to do the same, rather than the light use light plants. This means that all life in the deep seas is also based on metabolising carbon dioxide, and releases methane, helium, oxygen and gamma wave radiation.

    So carbon dioxide is the basis for all life on earth. Man-made climate change was devise by the professors of physics in basic contravention of the whole of known biology. There has been no increase in global carbon dioxide since the ending of the little ice-age. Then it was at four parts per 1,000,000, since the ice has receded is has been at two parts per 1,000,000.

    That is why nuclear power has such a problem with carbon dioxide. Their plant building, mining, purifying and shipping ore or produce as much carbon dioxide as if they burned fossil fuels.

    But burning fossil fuels increases life on earth: free carbon dioxide has not changed in 200 years, but according to Harvard University rot yields had increased by 15%.

    Nuclear power was desperate to make itself green after Chernobyl. So it picked on the gas which is the base fears for all plant life: more carbon dioxide, more plants alive today. Coincidentally, more nuclear power less life on earth. As I said in 2003.

    There are two sorts of molecular nuclear fusion are I have identified:

H2O->He+O+γ+E1    physical MNF where E1=1.5x1024 Watts per gram of hydrogen

CO2+3H2O->CH4+He+3O++E1    biological MNF

    So life on earth is based on nuclear fusion. Most of it is done capitalising the breakup of water with carbon dioxide. This totally blows toxic nuclear fission as the water. It uses no toxic uranium ore, we chatted mind them purified. And produces no toxic death, or waste which is point for hundreds of thousands of years.

    Nuclear fission is toxic, hazardous, more life threatening and uneconomic. Your own blood system does biological MNF as you heart beats. Waterfalls and breaking waves do physical MNF.

    Man is steam cycle also does MNF: so the industrial revolution was fusion driven, was we adopted the water and steam cycle.

    In 2001 I proposed replacing cooling towers with a helical turbulence heat exchanger: this pass the steam down one side of a double helix, and cold Carnot gas up the other lower leg. We then pressurise the Carnot gas and return 90 percent of the system heat to the boiler room water.

    This would reduce the fossil fuel burn by a factor of nine. My PhD got ended for no reason. I thought up molecular nuclear fusion in 2003. There is loads of MNF goes on in the boiler room and the turbine hall.

    So once started, a steam turbine would require no fossil fuel burn: it would produce no carbon dioxide – but plant life converts man is carbon dioxide into additional life on earth. But fossil fuels are expensive.

    Using my heat exchanger idea, we would burn no gas, oil or coal once the cycle was started. We also do no nuclear fission.

    A steam plasma tube would do MNF. So we could have for a street power plant that ran of a cup full of water a decade. We link in with the national grade so we could sell our excess power.

    Bubbling steam through liquid water creates 10 times as much steam. So we loop back 10% of the steam and years and the rest to generate power: we use my Carnot idea above to produce a Town Power station which burns no fossil fuels.

    There is no reason that nuclear fission from uranium should be allowed to persist on this planet: the next Chernobyl is 10 years overdue. What world city and country do you want to die in the nuclear winter next?

    That is where nuclear power thought up global warming! An exploding nuclear power plant causes a nuclear winter.

Saturday, 26 February 2011

No increase in CO2

    Harvard University has put on record that plants and bacteria have converted all man is additional carbon dioxide into more life on earth. So there is no more carbon dioxide in the air than last 200 years ago.

    As the world has concluded there is no man made climate change due to an increase in carbon dioxide: as there is been no increase in free carbon dioxide. Only an increase in life on earth.

    Any scientific institution or magazine that does work on climate change is duplicitous. Biology pegs free CO2 at two parts per 1,000,000.

    New Scientist magazine published the work by Harvard University. And yet still runs article on climate change. As if it was true, or made any mean for predictions. It is naked PR by nuclear power designed to kill.    

    To propose that man is carbon dioxide has had any affect on the weather at all is in direct contravention of the whole of biological science. It is fatal fiction. This makes New Scientist a paid stooge to nuclear power.

PHYSICS HAS IT WRONG

    Professors of physics said nuclear fusion can only occur over 10,000,000° C. Nobody told the deep sea.

    It produces helium, oxygen, gamma wave radiation and heat from the turbulent flow of the deep sea at 3° C. Green fields do the same in plant photoblasts at 10° C

    The deep sea does the biological and physical form of molecular nuclear fusion:

H2O->He+O+E1+γ    where E1=C2

CO2+3H2O->CH4+He+3P+E1

    Most of the heat of the air receives is from MNF. Photosynthesis turns out to you liked induced MNF.

    Your heart, arteries and mitochondria do it the biological form of MNF. At 30° C, if you feeling of colour. My thanks here to professor Argent who taught me always keep an open mind and examining their facts of the case

Wednesday, 23 February 2011

Safe fusion

    In 2007 NASA showed that bubbling steam through liquid water gave off nuclear radiation. The turbulence of the bubbles rising creates kinetic interactions between hydrogen atoms above the strong atomic force for hydrogens.

    So we convert the water into helium, oxygen, energy and low power gamma wave radiation. I have said elsewhere the energy is 1.5x1024 Watts for every 20 g of oxygen we do molecular nuclear fusion on.

    Was the boiler is in a state of boiling we can keep it boiling by recirculating 20% of the produced steam. We burn gas or oil to get the boiler are to temperature, then we turn of the fossil fuels.

    In operation the plant produces no carbon dioxide: only a whiff of helium and oxygen, like the deep sea produces. The plant in operation for a was exclusively of the heat produced by molecular nuclear fusion.

    No carbon dioxide, and no toxic fission waste. Using technology worked out in the 1950s: the Windscale kettle.

Safe fusion

    In 2007 NASA showed that bubbling steam through liquid water gave off nuclear radiation. The turbulence of the bubbles rising creates kinetic interactions between hydrogen atoms above the strong atomic force for hydrogens.

    So we convert the water into helium, oxygen, energy and low power gamma wave radiation. I have said elsewhere the energy is 1.5x1024 the Watts for every 20 g of oxygen we do molecular nuclear fusion on.

    Was the boiler is in a state of boiling we can keep it boiling by recirculating 20% of the produced steam. We burn gas or oil to get the boiler are to temperature, then we turn of the fossil fuels.

    In operation the plant produces no carbon dioxide: only a whiff of helium and oxygen, like the deep sea produces. The plant in operation for a was exclusively of the heat produced by molecular nuclear fusion.

    No carbon dioxide, and no toxic fission waste. Using technology worked out in the 1950s: the Windscale kettle.

End of a career

    David Bellamy and Johnny Bell were both TV science presenters in the 1980s. They burn dated global warming: saying that race of CO2 in the air had no effect climate.

    They had not realized that green plants had pegged the global of carbon dioxide in the global air at two parts per 1,000,000. The local values over New York are other cities has no impact on the global weather.

    The ending of my PhD has opened up my scripts writing career. It ended their presenting careers. In 2005 nuclear power moved its PR from global warming to climate change.

    It didn't get them their jobs back. Nor me my PhD back. Molecular nuclear fusion will power and heat our futures.

    Says Professor Zimmerman is comment 2 years ago that it was 'the not important', he has said nothing. It drives lightning, earthquakes and biology.

    It goes on in his own beating heart, if he has one.

Fossil fusion

    A flame of fossil fuels does molecular nuclear fusion:

Cm(H2O)n-> pHe+mCO2+ (H2O)(n-m-p)+E1
where E1=1.5x1024 Watts

    Luckily the gamma wave radiation is so low powered it can't find its way through a boiler surface. Or a kettle, as your kettle at home does physical molecular nuclear fusion. Producing just helium, oxygen and low power gamma wave radiation-as the act of a boiling releases massive amounts of heat.

    If you take a Geiger counter to a flame of fossil fuels, you will find the massive release of nuclear radiation. The fossil fuels themselves in the unburned state, releasing a very little nuclear radiation.

    As NASA noted in 2007, the act of boiling water produces a massive release of nuclear radiation as they do molecular nuclear fusion. That is my big contribution to the human pantheon, which Sheffield University ended my PhD over.

    Unlike David Bellamy and Johnny Ball, whose careers were ended over doubting global warming. I are no a video reporter and folk singer. Who is interested in scripts writing for the TV.

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

Phantom science

    Biology is carbon cycle states that green plants and bacteria take in all the available carbon dioxide they can: at degree level, you learn the lower limit for photosynthesis is two parts per 1,000,000.

    So in the evening air all around the world there has been two PPM CO2 in the air for the last 200 years: there is no more was any possibility that man-made global warming or climate change were anything other than PR by nuclear power.

    More CO2, more life on earth. No more carbon dioxide in the air, so no possibility of affecting the climate. By now sea levels should have risen by 18 feet, and the air should have been 21° C warmer.

    Wrong. With no possibility of being right. I told Sheffield University this in 2001, they ended my PhD there no award.

Impossible Climate Change

    Nuclear power has base stooges to think up ways that increasing carbon dioxide levels in the air could affect the weather. CO2 is a trace gas. Only at 2% who had any effect of carbon dioxide be experienced.

    But the global level is fixed by photosynthesis: as you release more carbon dioxide, you get more life on earth. Not had since the cretaceous could you have hoped to have affected the gas level in the free air.

    The global warming idea was thought up after Chernobyl. No science, just a desperate need to invent ways that nuclear power could be green. It is a fatal, toxic, polluting and uneconomic technology.

    They ceased on the gas they thought they didn't produce. But their plant building programme releases as much carbon dioxide as if they burned fossil fuels.

    Biology ever done them a six month course on the carbon cycle. The if you are under any delusion that carbon dioxide is the only other than the gas of life, I would recommend you take it.

    Carbon dioxide has remained static in the air since the little ice-age: it is at the lower limit for photosynthesis to take the gas Ian. All and man's carbon emissions have ended up as more life on earth.

    No increasing CO2 levels in the free air, no global warming: but that ended in 1998 or 2005 depending on where you live. But also no man made climate change.

    All the academics writing papers on these 'sciences' should not be in education: as I have said before, they have a promising careers fiction writing ahead of them.

    Any academic agreeing with these ideas also should look for other employment.

Sunday, 20 February 2011

Man does not affect the weather

    His carbon dioxide is taken in by plants to form new life on earth. Any high school kid knows that. There is no conceivable mechanism whereby a static two parts per 1,000,000 carbon dioxide can affect the weather.

    As I said in 2005 we need more than 2% carbon dioxide in the air. Not the a static 2 ppm. Which leaves Professor Zimmerman with a problem.

    The financial viability of Chemical Engineering is only possible with the money from nuclear power. That isn't going to be there any more.

    The only chance is there Sheffield University researches molecular nuclear fusion. The physical form is more relevant to engines. I leave with the formula they did not deign to give me a PhD for:

H2O->He+O+E1+γ    where E1=1.5x1024 Watts


 

Jonathan Thomason    117 Merchant's Quay, Salford Quays Greater Manchester     M50 3XQ

JonThm9@aol.com T/F 0161 848-0416

Nature does fusion

    In the physical world where we see steam or high pressure water in turbulent flow we see the production of gamma wave radiation and release of helium. These products are the result of molecular nuclear fusion from water. We also get heat and free radical oxygen. This is so significant I am staggered no scientist has been knocked on it.

    The biological world also does molecular nuclear fusion. Producing helium, methane, oxygen, heat and gamma wave radiation from water and carbon dioxide. There is no chemical source of helium of gamma wave radiation.

    I first came across the idea from the release of gamma wave radiation and production of helium from steam and the IC engines. I talked to my PhD supervisor from the Zimmerman about this, and he never did reply!

    This is power with no carbon dioxide or toxic, radioactive fission waste. It goes on in the deep sea. MNF occurs in your heart and arteries as you heart beats.

    It also goes on in plant photoblasts and animal mitochondria. This means photosynthesis is light induced molecular nuclear fusion. The natural world is full of it. Steam, jets and IC engines all do it. So the engineering world is full of it.

    And engineers wander around with Geiger counters: I was told in 1983 that a working steam engine gives off gamma wave radiation and produces helium. Every engineer academic on this planet knows this. A lot of them are earning a lot of money from climate change: phantom science from nuclear power.

    Nuclear fusion from water is safe, clean and free. Nuclear fission from uranium is uneconomic, toxic, polluting, dangerous and toxic. More nuclear power plants based on nuclear fission means a more Chernobyls around the world.

    They invented the phantom science of global warming to get new plants. It did not work. Harvard University has put on record that global carbon dioxide levels have not changed in 200 years. It is the global level of carbon dioxide which was meant to affect the world climate.

    Through history carbon dioxide follows the natural climate with a four year lag: as it is metabolised by green plants. So global warming and climate change started with a wrong idea: there has been no man made increase in carbon dioxide levels in the air.

Global wrong

After Chernobyl nuclear power realised it had to be seen to be 'green' to get new plants. Their plants are turned over every 25 years, so the club was counting. EDF has got this lifespan expanded for immediate English nuclear plants, which is stupid. It guarantees the UK. Fact is than Chernobyl within the next five years.

It seized on their discredited science of global warming: which was a reaction to the ending of the scientific scare stories of the impending ice-age. The natural weather have 28 years cycles of warming and cooling, so we were in for a warming period. Which is due to end in 2005.

It was all based on the erroneous supposition that man is emission of carbon dioxide would increase the levels of this trace gas in the air. There is more helium in the air than there is carbon dioxide.

This is caused by plants and bacteria taking in carbon dioxide and metabolising it. Usually in photosynthesis. Which produces helium, oxygen, low power gamma wave radiation and heat: there is no chemical source of gamma wave radiation or helium.

It transpires photosynthesis is light induced, biological, molecular nuclear fusion:

CO2+3H2O->CH4+E1+He+3O+γ in the presence of light

Your kettle at home does physical molecular nuclear fusion:

H2O->E1+He+O+γ as fluid turbulence of boiling affects the water in the kettle

This means man's steam cycle does nuclear fusion. Your own beating heart does biological MNF. The whole or biology is powered by it. Hot smokers in the sea receive no energy from the San, but are powered by steam bubbles into high pressure water are doing MNF.

That is why there is so much helium in the air. We lose it every day so this means life on earth gets 6x1040 Watts of power from this source every day. At lightning strikes the oxygen bonds with interstellar hydrogen we gain from space, to produce water.

Molecular nuclear fusion is us the most important Energy System on earth. Producing no carbon dioxide and no toxic, radioactive, fission waste. And it is free.

A flame of burning fossil fuels does physical MNF. Which is why a flame gives off nuclear radiation. As does a working car engine, which does physical MNF.


Saturday, 19 February 2011

Air coolers

This is my idea from 2001 which got my PhD into solving Global Warming ended. It uses established science from the 18th century to take heat from the air and putting in the seas. In the cold countries we reverse the cycle to warm the air.

Sheffield could establish a chain of air warmer in the Eden Valley. To work out the science, an increase tourism local to Sheffield.

Air coolers fast warm air down a double helix. The other leg is filled with a cold Carnot gas. So the air cools and the is the bottom of the device as cold air. Where it passes over A wind turbine. This generates power.

This power drives people which compresses the Carnot gas. The winter turbine is on the outside of the helix, so has a large diameter.

The pump has a very small diameter. This gives us a large mechanical advantage. The energy we extract cools the air a bit more.

We now have a small volume of hot gas. This with fast over a small helix in the sea or a large body of water. As the temperature increases with acid temperature linked to the applied pressure, the gas is at 250° C.

The sea water is heated and quickly exits the small helix. Drawing in more cold sea water. So we get rapid dissipation of a Carnot heat.

The Carnot gas the small helix at 10° C. I have not done the maths here, but we are looking at a cold Carnot temperature of -45° C. Where this meets the air at more than 30° C, we are going to get rapid cooling.

We collect the condensate, which is a free source of pure water. We use the excess pumping power we generate two part this water to irrigation channels over the land. This encourages plant growth, which sinks more carbon dioxide.

In truth green plants have ensured that global carbon dioxide levels have remained static at two PPM for the last 200 years. There never was any effect of man on the weather through his production of carbon dioxide. Rather biology teaches he has increased life on earth.

Using air warmers and coolers he can increase the temperate area of the earth which supports plant growth. He also has more fresh water available to irrigate the land.

Once started air warmer and coolers are self powering. We want to site them in the cold and hot lands to cycle heat to and from the seas all the year.

In temperate areas like the UK we will have to reverse the Carnot cycle every year. So we would wish to power up batteries to start the cycle twice a year.

I thought all this through in 2001. My PhD got ended as a result. Why? I was improving life on earth, though not as nuclear power would maintain, saving all life on earth.

Green plants already do that one, naturally.

Incorrect graphs

    Biology teaches that green plants sink all the available carbon dioxide: and have done for 650,000,000 years: so free carbon dioxide levels in the air only rise in ice-ages.

    Suddenly the physics stooges to nuclear power produce graphs with estimated carbon dioxide levels over the land. They are impossible. Life on earth has increased to absolve all man is carbon dioxide since the industrial revolution.

    University biology department are overruled by physics: who want the money provided by nuclear power.

    Likewise engineering is desperate for their cash. They are prepared to promote nuclear PR, even though it is theoretical nonsense, for the cash.

    In 2007 I sent Harvard University a video making this point. August 2010 they published in new scientist, the results of a world wide minerals survey.

    They found that free carbon dioxide in the air had not altered for 200 years: exactly as told by high school biology. Rot yields had increased by 15%. The other 5% will be the increase of non crop plants and bacteria. Of

    Sheffield University is a world leading institution for gas analysis. Where is their analysis of the air over the countryside in the UK? Only over cities can have been local carbon dioxide increase: which has no effect on the weather.

    The increases in crop yields over last 200 years has been incorrectly attributed to better fertilises and field irrigation.

Friday, 18 February 2011

Huge Energy

C2 is about 1.5x1024 m/s

Each day life on earth gains 6x1040 Watts from local nuclear fusion on compounds of hydrogen. The speed of light cubed is only 3.2x1036!

Thursday, 17 February 2011

More life

    80% of the carbon dioxide released annually is exhaled by animals. This is why animals evolved, at the end of the cretaceous life on earth hit a brick wall as there was insufficient carbon dioxide. They could only metabolise during the day, what they have excreted at night.

    The metabolism is a biological, molecular, nuclear fusion:

CO2+3H2O->He+CH4+O+E1    where E1=1.5 x 1024 Watts – according to Einstein and the E=mc2

Then        mCH4+nH2O->Cm(H2O)n+m(2He+E1) – Cm(H2O)n

Cm(H2O)n= the carbohydrates of life!

    You may deduce I have an M.Eng in metallurgy and engineering. Which involved a lot of chemistry.

    From the 18th century, and man is industrial revolution, we have released additional carbon dioxide. Which green plants have taken in with pleasure. So there is still the same 2 ppm carbon dioxide in the air that there was 200 years ago.

    In the August edition of new scientist Harvard University published the fact, but yields had increased by 15%. They did not document the increase in bacterial and plant life in the seas.

    Bacteria and algae also do you biological MNF. So we would expect more evaporation from the seas. So mall global rain. Global warming was self serving fiction from nuclear power. Predicting higher air levels of carbon dioxide, which are biological impossibility says green plants evolved 650,000,000 years ago.

    We are getting more global rain. Hence the flooding in 2004, and in fact all this millennia. Australia has just suffered the worst floods in a century.

    This is what is going to happen in the future. We need to dragged out natural Rivers, an install baffles. So you can drop the baffles an increase the flow in the Rivers in time of high rainfall.

    Plant life is going to love it: more fresh water falling from the skies. More available carbon dioxide they are already sinking from the air. So we have more plant life their. And in turn, we have more animals life.

    It turns out that man is additional carbon dioxide is the best thing man kind has ever done for life on earth. Man-made climate change is phantom science from nuclear power: they are scare stories are designed to scare the stupid.

    Which is why today, nobody not in the pay of nuclear power, believes a syllable of it. Go and talk to a biologist about the carbon cycle. They he will tell you that all life on earth results from plants and bacteria metabolising carbon dioxide.

    In so doing they excrete the oxygen animals have to breathe: so they can exhale the carbon dioxide plants need to grow. Nuclear power does Chernobyls. They kill all life on earth. They are fatal, toxic, bomb technology. Man-made global warming and climate change are their PR.

Wednesday, 16 February 2011

The last decade

    Since I was on my PhD at Sheffield academics have been paid ¼ billion dollars by the funding agencies to research a climate fiction of nuclear power.

    Between 1983 and 2005 this was global warming. But then the weather entered a natural cooling phase. So nuclear power moved its PR to be 'man-made climate change'. And still based upon the mythical rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide.

    Any high school biology teacher could have told them that green plants have sunk all the additional carbon dioxide, created more life on earth. Which leaves no more carbon dioxide in the air that after the little ice-age.

    There has never been any man made increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Any academic who were suggest there might have been, has no place in any level of education. An 11 your child would tell nuclear power this was not possible.

    Says green plants evolved 650,000,000 years ago, the only time carbon dioxide has risen above today's level of two parts per 1,000,000 is during an ice-age.

    So elevated carbon dioxide follows global cooling. It never forces the weather. As there is no more carbon dioxide in the air, it never could.

    Meanwhile life gets on with molecular nuclear fusion. This has two varieties:

Physical        H2O->He+O+E1+y    as the result of turbulence in high pressure water or steam.

Biological    CO2+3H2O->He+CH4+3P+3E1+γ    as a result of turbulence in biological systems.

    This explains why nuclear power has fetched trouble that carbon dioxide. They failed to realise that their use of the steam cycle meant they did molecular nuclear fusion.

    So bubbling steam through high pressure water does MNF. My favourite way is via a steam plasma two. I told Sheffield University this in 2008, and they have been too busy to try out.

    A decade ago my PhD into Global Warming got ended as I said it was fiction from nuclear power. I was right. But nuclear power is of baby investor, via the funding agencies, in higher education.

    Now the world does umpire it Global Warming or Climate Change. They are very interesting in nuclear fusion. It is safe, clean and free. No carbon dioxide and no toxic fission waste. No Chernobyl either.

    It will be the savior of chemistry departments all over the world. We know it is real, as nature is driven by it.

    Green plants in the light produce methane, helium, gamma wave radiation, oxygen and heat. From regular water. Photosynthesis is light induced MNF.

    Waterfalls and breaking waves do physical MNF. So we get helium, gamma wave radiation, oxygen and heat. There is no chemical source of gamma waves. There is no radioactive isotopes that in decompose at the sea shore.

    Living animals do MNF. In the arteries and mitochondria. Bacteria do the same at their power units.

    How did academics miss MNF? They were too busy eating well of the research money provided to look into Global Warming or Climate Change. Money which finally tracks back to nuclear power.

    So what happened to my PhD? It vanished. Nobody, no matter how clever, was allowed to rubbish global warming. The weather did though.

    How about Climate Change? The sunburnt Global Warming? Scientist could never figure out how a static 2 ppm carbon dioxide in the air would have had any affect on the weather. No warming was possible.

    The weather always changes. So to propose that carbon dioxide causes this where the shift, is so simplistic we wrong; who ever thought of the idea, needs serious medical help.

    The weather has always existed, and will always exist; while the sun continues to shine.

    If we allow a new generation of nuclear power plants, we will not be here to see it. We will all die in their radioactive nuclear winter. Global cooling big time.

    That is probably the genesis for global warming. Nuclear power realised it causes terminal global cooling.

Nature does fusion

    All through nature where ever we have the turbulent flow of high pressure water or steam, we see the creation of helium, oxygen and more heat than you can throw a the stick at:

H2O->He+O+E1    E1=7.5x1022/gram of water

Biology does

CO2+3H2O->He+CH4+3O. ↑

    Strangely enough Sheffield University did not consider this idea worthy of a PhD. Tell the department of Engineering Materials, what you think of this.

    This is clean power, with no carbon dioxide or toxic fission waste. It is how biology is driven. Sinking carbon dioxide to do nuclear fusion.

    So man's carbon dioxide has resulted in more life on earth there has been no increase in free carbon dioxide in the air since the little ice-age: carbon dioxide can only rise when there are fewer green plants alive.

Monday, 14 February 2011

Heat production from MNF

    Every day MNF from water in the air, sea and on land produces helium. This is lost to space. We gain hydrogen, and at lightning strikes get back our water.

    The mass of the air is 5 x 1021 g

    Percentage of helium in the air 5.24 x 10-6

    This is lost to space, so this represents the mass of helium produced daily. I guesstimate 98.5% of this comes from molecular nuclear fusion.

    Einstein postulated E=mc2    but for every mole of hydrogen consumed, we only a produced by half a more of helium.

So    5 x 1021 x 5.24 x 10-6 x 0.75 x 1024x0.985= 1.94x 1040 Watts of heat. Which is 19,4000 MMMMMM Watts of heat. This is the biggest number I have seen.

    I have to use an addition of powers, as this number would not fit in my calculator. It is the most significant he had imput the air receives.

Sunday, 13 February 2011

Power plant conversion


 

    We can simply replace or metal fission tubes, with steam plasma fusion tubes. These convert water into helium and oxygen:

H2O->3He+16/18O+E1

    The 3He decays before it leaves the plant. We can safely vent it to the air as it is inert. And it joining us all the helium released by the deep.

    Green plants in the light do molecular nuclear fusion. We lose the helium to space and breathe in the oxygen. It has ½ life of 5000 years.

    But animal life has evolved to clear damaged cells away from the lungs. The rate of local cell damage causes lung cancer. If we give a patient with lung cancer a drip of IL-2+ we produce and action the active human antibody to lung cancer.

    This displays the antigens acquired from infective disease. We need a combination of pathogen RNA with high levels of cell damage; to cause cancer.

    Nuclear fusion is four times as energetic as nuclear fission. Molecular nuclear fusion occurs from regular water. It produces no toxic waste. The water only undergoes nuclear fusion in a steam plasma.

    All existing nuclear power plants can thus be converted to safe nuclear fusion. Nuclear fission is toxic death.

    When I found out that INCO was involved in this trade, I left.


 

Jonathan Thomason

Friday, 11 February 2011

Bacteria do fusion

    In swamps bacteria combine carbon dioxide with water. And produce the flammable mixture of methane and oxygen. They are doing molecular nuclear fusion. The helium and gamma wave radiation are not notice.

    In the same way the guts of cows host Colonies of bacteria which breakdown grass. They also produce methane and oxygen.

    Where we have the turbulent flow of high pressure water, in the deep seas we get the production of helium, oxygen, heat and gamma wave radiation by physical molecular nuclear fusion. At 3oC.

    So 60% of the heat the air receipts is from nature doing molecular nuclear fusion from water.

Thursday, 10 February 2011

Saving the world

    Or exothermic systems on the earth do molecular nuclear fusion. Flames of fossil fuels do it. As does the turbulent flow of deep water.

    Jet aircraft do it. But rather than supercharge with more radiation fuel, we boil off water using a two circling the exhaust manifold, and introduce this steam after the combustion chamber and before the turbine.

    This gives us a hypersonic jet which uses little aviation fuel. Once the system established we can turn of all or oil burning.

    How do I know this works –as you refuse to work in the air. In 1983 I spent the summer in the power generation industry. And discovered the turbine halls of power plants give our massive amounts of nuclear radiation.

    There was no source of nuclear fission. Or radioactive decay. The only explanation was molecular nuclear fusion from water.

    You gave me a hint here, we're the fluid turbulence of hydrogen gas doing nuclear fusion. A gas of molecular hydrogen also does nuclear fusion.

    We turn regular water into heat. We produce some 2He, and oxygen. And loads of heat. And a little low power gamma wave radiation: as we get today, when ever we boil off water.

    Take your Geiger counter, do make yourself a hot drink and confirm this.

    No plutonium or strontium: incidentally, water falls create St, from the turbulent flow of water. Bit of a giveaway that one.

    Nuclear power plants were originally designed to produce plutonium for nuclear bombs. We would rather plutonium was kept out of the hands of terrorists.

    Thinking laterally, a way he to produce molecular hydrogen in turbulent flow, in that temperature range required for engineering, is to fire up a steam plasma tube.

    If we scale down lightning a 1 metre long two should produce 30 MW of heat. With no carbon dioxide, and no radioactive waste at all. The higher atomic nuclei fission into hydrogen, then light and heat.

    All the new science here was done in the 1950s. It masterly undercuts the burning of fossil fuels. It is the way biology is powered. Who ever gets this to press first, gets her name in the history books.

    And improves life on earth.


 

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Wednesday, 9 February 2011

The proof of fusion

    In 1982 on my engineering degree I was wandering around a steam turbine plant. The background count was four Curries and the diesel oil by burned was a fossil fuel with the radiation count of eight.

    When he used to prove steam, the boiler room had recounted of 600. Created by the effect of steam bubbles rising through liquid water; THIS was confirmed by NASA 2006.

    So a steam that powers in the turbine hall had account of nine. The turbine itself gave out 2,500 Curries. So steam been passed in that turbulent fashion over titanium turbine blades give out massive amounts of radiation.

    So all this radiation release came from water or steam in turbulent flow. 29 years ago I was told about molecular nuclear fusion. Safe, clean, cheap power with no carbon dioxide or radioactive waste.

    If we recirculate 20% of the steam from all boiler room we remove the need to burn fossil fuels to get the steam in a state of boiling. So no carbon dioxide from man. No need to do toxic nuclear fission.


Tuesday, 8 February 2011

Spurious research

    All PhD proposals for the last 20 years have referenced year the global warming, or since 2005 climate change –as the world cooled.

    Both spurious sciences were based on the erroneous assumption that man is emission of carbon dioxide had increased the level of this gas in the global air.

    Green plants have converted all the extra carbon dioxide into additional life on earth. The level of carbon dioxide is purely determined by the efficiency of photosynthesis to sink CO2.

    The so all the research proposals are fraudulent, and will need to be redrafte. Nuclear power invented Global Warming to get a new generation of power plants built.

    That is not going to happen. Man can use steam plasma tubes to replace metal fission tubes. They are four times as exothermic, and produce no radioactive waste.

    Welcome to the fusion age.


 

Jonathan Thomason    117 Merchant's Quay, Salford Quays Greater Manchester     M50 3XQ

JonThm9@aol.com T/F 0161 848-0416


 

Monday, 7 February 2011

Changing life

    The nature does loads are nuclear fusion from water: what I call molecular nuclear fusion. It produces gamma wave radiation and helium.

    The only terrestrial source of gamma wave radiation I know about is the radioactive decay of thorium. Green plants only emit gamma waves in the daytime. At night it metabolises oxygen and its carbohydrates. Though at night, very little metabolism occurs.

    Lightning strikes also produce gamma waves and helium. This is the province of nuclear reactions. There is no source of nuclear fusion or radioactive decay in moist air.

    The only show in town is molecular nuclear fusion from water. You are a professor of Chemical Engineering. Explain to me why we are not seeing molecular nuclear fusion.

    MNF often as mankind the chance of free, non polluting and clean power. With no carbon dioxide or toxic radioactive waste. This is vitally important. RSVP apologies for their spurious definite articles my speech recognition software inserts in my dictation.


 

Jonathan Thomason    117 Merchant's Quay, Salford Quays Greater Manchester     M50 3XQ

JonThm9@aol.com T/F 0161 848-0416

Unresearched

    Biology does

CO2+3H2O -> He+CH4+3O+γ+E1    where E1=1.5 x 1024 Watts

    This is biological, molecular, nuclear fusion. Our blood system and mitochondria do it. Which is why we exhale helium and methane. And produce gamma wave radiation as our heart beats, and we are just alive. Life on earth is driven by this.

    Green plants in the light do it. As to growing bacteria. Animal blood systems also do it. It is the most important energy input into life on earth.

    The physical world also does it

H2O -> He +O.+γ+E1

    Man's steam cycle does so much of it. Which is why conventional power stations and nuclear fission plants both run a steam cycle. Because this does nuclear fusion from water.

    Just burning carbohydrates for hydrocarbons does molecular nuclear fusion. Which is why we get out so much heat. My thanks go to Professor Zimmerman for pointing out that high pressure water in turbulent flow does nuclear fusion.

    The guy he refuses now to concede that molecular nuclear fusion is the most important Energy System on earth.

Sunday, 6 February 2011

Rain

    Rainstorms produce gamma wave radiation, plus helium and oxygen gases. They do physical, molecular, nuclear fusion:

2H2O->He2++2OH-+γ+E1    where E1 is a massive number. See my other articles

    The Alpha particles (He2+) rise to above the clouds, the hydroxyl molecules(OH) carry the negative charge to the ground. They bond with molecular oxygen in the soil, to form ozone. We have all smell ozone a rain storm.

    If we have a handy Geiger counter we could also are have measures the gamma wave radiation. So plain rain does molecular nuclear fusion. All around the earth, every day.

    A charge of 5000 volts, an 100 amps fires up a lightning strike. We get a gentle drift down of electoral holes setting up a steam plasma in the moist air. We then get an up strike of 1.2 x 1020 Watts for three seconds. The initial down strike was only 0.5 x 106 Watts in power.

    Around the earth we get one lightning strike every three sections. Which fixes nitrogen into nitrous and nitric acids. This falls to the ground and fertilises life. No organic nitrogen, no life on earth.

    Nature does this at around 20o Celsius. At one atmosphere pressure. It is free. Life on earth would be impossible without it. Nature isn't interested that suns shine out 10,000,000° C. It just gets on with the job in hand.

    Lightning bolts are random. Totally unpredictable. But if we strike up a steam plasma in a one metre tube, it will take 2000 volts and 0.01 amps current. Once initiated it will turn water into heat.

    While we top up the water level this will produce heat. We can use this heat to produce power. With no carbon dioxide, and no toxic radioactive waste. My PhD supervisor says he does not have than 30 minutes spare to try this out. What do you think about that?

    To everybody out there, you need a glass tube with electrodes 1,000,000. A source of steam like a paint stripper, and the electrics from a fluorescent light. Then your we'll need a small pump to top up the water level. I would recommend you use three such tubes to drive 100 MW steam turbine system.

    Coincidentally, man's steam cycle does molecular nuclear fusion already.

Nature does fusion

    A decade ago I was doing a PhD into global warming: this was five years before the world started cooling naturally. In the last 200 years plants have converted all man is additional carbon dioxide into more life on earth. So man's carbon dioxide could not affect the weather. As there is no more free carbon dioxide in the air than there was after the little ice-age: data source Harvard University.

    This is easy to confirm. Take a gas sample a wave and towns and cities anywhere away from the poles, and it will yield a carbon dioxide level of two parts per 1,000,000. And has for all recorded time. Man made global warming was fiction from the base stooges to nuclear power.

    I remembered from my master's degree that steam, IC, and jet engines all gave out gamma wave radiation while working. So do green plants in the light, plus animals and growing bacteria. Also waterfalls, breaking waves, flowing rivers and lakes.

    What we are seeing I named molecular nuclear fusion: with some help from professor Argent at Sheffield University. There are two main sorts. Physical and biological MNF.

H2O -> He + O. + E1    where E1=1.5 x 1024 Watts. This is from E=mc2    this follows the environment with 3He and 22O. We lose the helium to space, and breathe in a long half life oxygen. Particularly in country walks.

    The 3He decays in 0.04 sections, so via a time it has been produced it has decayed harmlessly.

CO2 + 3H2O -> 3He+14CH4+3O.++E1

    This has gone on since bacteria involved in the primeval soup of the early seas. Nature does not do nuclear fusion from uranium, as this is toxic to all life on earth. In contrast all life on earth does harmless MNF. Biology is powered by it.

    MNF does go on in hot moist air, which drives hurricanes and tornadoes. If we use a star powering Carnot system we can pass the heat from the air into the seas, and stop hurricanes etc the.

    Molecular nuclear fusion our goes from regular water, for free. Producing no carbon dioxide and no toxic radioactive waste. It is four times as energetic as nuclear fission, in addition to being non toxic and free.

Saturday, 5 February 2011

The seas save us

    Green plants evolved 650,000,000 years ago. They got busy with 40% carbon dioxide in the air. They converted it into carbohydrates, and excreted the surplus oxygen. This ended up as O3 –ozone.

    The end of the cretaceous there was only one part per 1,000,000 carbon dioxide in the air. Plants could only take in during the day, the carbon dioxide they have excreted at night. In night time metabolism they took in oxygen and combined it with carbohydrates. This releases gamma wave radiation as it does molecular nuclear fusion.

    90% of life on earth died. It was her biggest mass extinction in earth history. Life I only got around this as plants evolved into animals. They did nighttime respiration all day. They a plant matter, and combined it the oxygen they got from the air.

    The level of carbon dioxide in the air is not related to carbon dioxide emissions on earth. It is a function solely, of photosynthesis taking then the gas of life. In ice-ages carbon dioxide can reach 10 parts per 1,000,000. In the little ice-age of the 18th century it only reached four parts per 1,000,000: there being fewer plants to sink carbon dioxide.

    The wax and wane of plants is controlled solely by solar emission cycles –beyond the control of man. Carbon dioxide follows plant growth cycles. It has never, in or recorded history, determined the weather.

    That phantom science was devised by tame physicist for nuclear power after Chernobyl. They obviously didn't even know high school biology. There is no way man can affect photosynthesis. So there is no way he can affect the level of carbon dioxide in the air.

    More carbon dioxide, as I said on my for four years ago, more life on earth. More nuclear power stations, more death on earth. Man-made global warming and climate change are total lies by nuclear power. Who do a usually listen to about biology?

    I think it is safe to assume nuclear power is at the bottom of the list.

    Opinions differ on whether the natural climate started cooling in 1998, or 2005. The idea of global warming was it would warm the whole the world, every day. So tax, within five years not to millennia.

    In 2005 nuclear power started pushing 'man made climate change'. To say, for the first time in recorded history, carbon dioxide would determine the weather. Global warming said the weather will be hotter and drier.

    Now we are told, by global warming pundits have it wrong. The weather will be wetter, cooler and more dynamic. Welcome to the natural weather are planet earth.

    Harvard University checked this out for me, and published the results in the August edition of New Scientist. Since carbon dioxide fell to two parts per 1,000,000 after the little ice-age, it had remained static. All man's carbon dioxide has ended up in more life on earth.

    So there is no more carbon dioxide in the air. Sea levels haven't risen. Droughts as common as they ever were. We have just had the coldest December on record in the UK, and in the U.S. the winter snows look to more severe than 2008.

    Nuclear power are still toxic death. There is no person alive, not in their pay, wants a new nuclear power plant building. I repeat, because it's worth it: there has been no increase in global carbon dioxide for 200 years.

    The local increases in the vanishing this small areas of the city's, only persist until the next wind blows the gas of life over the countryside. Bacteria in the deep sea are better at sinking carbon dioxide and green plants are.

    If there ever have been an increase in sea level, levels of carbon dioxide in the air with fallen. But there never has been. More lies from nuclear power. And there paid stooges. Who turned a hang out in colleges and universities. They should not be in education.

Abnormal heat

    Green plants have ensured there has been no rise in free carbon dioxide in the global air fall last 200 years. Man-made global warming was devise by nuclear power after Chernobyl.

    They have tame physicist and engineers, but no biologist whenever work for them. They are toxic death, they kill all life on earth. Starting with you, if they get new plants of death built.

    There is no more life on earth, but no effect of man on the global weather. Except by the heat released by nuclear power.

    This is totally abnormal. This fatal industry should be limited to making bombs: which is where they came from. Hence their fatal nature.

    Carbon dioxide is the gas of life. And boosts life on earth.

Friday, 4 February 2011

The world climate

    has been cooling since 2005. The only reason nuclear power is still funding media on global warming is that the details of climate change never came together.

    What would happen, when it will happen and he is a historical precedent never made it.

    Says carbon dioxide fell after the little ice-age, man's carbon dioxide has increased life on earth, but not increased free carbon dioxide in the air.

    So obviously, there was no effect on the weather. Historically carbon dioxide rises in an ice-age anyway. It goes down in a warm period.

    All the scientists ever pretended global warming hard any academic true should not be easy not be in education. It was self serving fiction from nuclear power, the agents of death.

Wednesday, 2 February 2011

Molecular nuclear fusion ∞

    If we have higher pressure water or steam in turbulent flow we do MNF:

H2O -> He+O↑.+γ+E1    where E1= 1.5 x 1024 Watts per mole of water

    It is the most important Energy System on earth. It drives waterfalls. Volcanoes. Tornados, green plants in the light and even goes on in animal blood systems.

    Power with no carbon dioxide. I was doing the calculations last night and it contributes 5 x 1040 Watts to nature every second of the day. This is 1020 more than burning fossil fuels. And 1034 times more than nuclear fission from uranium.

    1020 is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. C2 is only 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. So it is a massive number. It goes on every second of the day. So provides 60x60x24 x365.25 x 1020 Watts through the year.

    With no carbon dioxide or toxic radioactive waste. Mathematicians approximate infinity to 108. So MNF contributes 4 x ∞3 Watts of power to life on earth

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

The greatest boon

    My PhD into the climate got ended 2001 for no reason. This has not stop me working on the area there. Partly encouraged by a Dr. MatZinger in Washington DC.

    I found out 2003 that plants have sunk all the available carbon dioxide in the air. 2007 I had told Harvard University. Almost 2010 they published a mineral results in New Scientist. There has been no increase in free carbon dioxide in the air, as it fell from 4 to 2 parts per 1,000,000 at the end of the little ice-age.

    2008 I became aware that nature is powered by molecular nuclear fusion from water.

H2O -> He+O+E1    where E1 equals 1.5 x 1024 Watts per gram of hydrogen consumed

    We breathe in the oxygen, and the helium is lost to space. In time we gain hydrogen and at lightning strikes get back our water. Clean, safe, free power.

    It has gone on around the air for 38,000,000,000 years. We need near fossil fuels non toxic nuclear fission from uranium. What we need to do is find out how it works. This will be the greatest boon to Chemical Engineering research ever.