Tuesday, 31 January 2012

Global impossibility

31 January 2012
Mankind’s additional carbon dioxide accounts for 0.0000175% of the atmospheric carbon dioxide in the air. Plants doing photosynthesis have converted this into additional life on earth.
Man made global warming was a biological impossibility.
In 1998 the world started cooling: so nuclear power publicised man made climate change still based on the erroneous notion that man could affect the level of carbon dioxide in the air.
He can’t. He can just increased the amount of life on earth.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Monday, 30 January 2012

Nature does nuclear fusion

30 January 2012

On my PH D in 2001 the then Dr. Zimmerman told me that nature had a high incidence of the emission of gamma wave radiation been no source of nuclear fusion: in other words, emission of nuclear radiation without radioactive decay was throughout nature.
Similarly there production of helium gas (and free radical oxygen) where ever we have the turbulent flow of high pressure water or gas ubiquitous.
Dr. Zimmerman highlighted the importance of fluid turbulence of water on this system. He had no explanation: even though there this was the science he was working on.
I drove over to Sheffield 2009 us all the now Professor Zimmerman. I have steam about molecular nuclear fusion: where the fluid turbulence of steam or high pressure water converts the water into helium and oxygen gases, plus gamma wave radiation and heat.
This is the most important terrestrial energy source on there is! It contributes 2x1015 Watts of heat a day to the Energy System of the world.
Will has stated in 2003 that this system was not important. The relativistic conversion of helium gas into heat energy produce he added figure in last paragraph. Separate to this is the 3x1039 Watts of heat produced every 3 minutes by lightning strikes.
He has a double first in Chemical Engineering and mathematics: so the emission of nuclear radiation from systems doing nuclear fusion would be expected. He stated that he did not know about the system! Despite him having spent the last decade arguing against it.
I did not invent molecular nuclear fusion! Even though the name was thought up by professor Argent at Sheffield University.
By denying knowledge of MNF, Will Zimmerman excused himself from having any knowledge of it. He has 40 pages of information about this Energy System I have sent him. He has three doctors from Princeton concerning physics!
He both knows about the production of helium and emission of gamma wave radiation, and he knows about the massive heat production of this Energy System. In other words, he knows enough about it to deliver at 20 session lecture course on molecular nuclear fusion.
But he is still in total denial of the most important Energy System on earth. It is talking about the science it is actively researching. His reason for not wishing to discuss molecular nuclear fusion is that ‘it does not fit with his paid research’.
Not that it isn’t real. Not that the mass shown it is vitally important to biology and life on earth. Just that he isn’t paid to engage with it. He is not age ended for gravity even. But his feet are still firmly anchored on the ground.
Denying truth is a sign of a derelict mind. Prof Zimmerman has three doctors from Princeton. They value thought. And engaging with the physical world. He should be all over molecular nuclear fusion. He properly is.
Whoever is not apparently interested in the Energy System which will power our futures. That produces power with no carbon dioxide or toxic plutonium. That totally destroys the idea of nuclear fusion.
That is a toxic, polluting, fatal and uneconomic industry.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Fusion powered

By JonThm9@aol.com
The industrial revolution was driven by steam machines. These produce steam in turbulent flow. Which resulted in the production of helium and oxygen gases. When the emission of gamma wave radiation: steam engines do molecular nuclear fusion.
They turn regular water into helium and oxygen gases. So the two hydrogen is become one helium: that is nuclear fusion! Which is usually accompanied by the emission of nuclear radiation. All life on earth in its nuclear radiation, as all life on earth does molecular nuclear fusion, in plant photoblasts or animal and bacterial mitochondria. As you asked.
So nature has no trouble at all doing nuclear fusion from water! Mankind only learned how to with the development of steam engine’s as industrial revolution happened.
We get the formation of inept helium, and breathable oxygen-though we do tend to produce ozone gas! And the gamma wave radiation is very low powered, so doesn’t penetrate even scheme. No toxic end product after all.
Rain does it! Molecular nuclear fusion is totally free and nontoxic. And very exothermic!

Fracking

By JonThm9@aol.com
Here we pump steam down to percolate up through carbohydrates containing shales: the carbohydrates is from life that died with the dinosaurs at the end of the Jurassic. A steam does physical molecular nuclear fusion:
Cm(H2O)n+pH2O->mCH4+rHe+(p+n-r/2)O.+vH2O+γ+E
Loads of lovely nuclear constants work years on a series of PH D’s and experiments. We get methane, helium, free radical oxygen and some ithis circulating steam. We get helium and heat generation. So we can loop back the hot steam. The gamma wave radiation is contained in the deep. They have just started doing this in Blackpool and have found a person year’s supply of natural gas.
This technique will work all over the earth! There are massive supplies of natural gas below Texas. This will massively overshadow the oil that was extracted from the ground below Texas. Old land area that was flooded as the Jurassic ended will have a massive reserves of carbohydrates containing shales.
Canada will find massive reserves of carbohydrates containing shales. It developed the for wrecking technology: from steam injection into nearly exhausted or oil Wells.
All these shales contain fossilised life. When we burn the natural gas, plants alive on earth today we’ll grow, absorbing the additional organic carbon. For the last 200 years man is additional carbon dioxide has increased life on earth by 0.0000175% a day! There has been no accumulation of carbon dioxide in the air.
In the presence of photosynthesis man has no control over the level of carbon dioxide in the air. All he can do is increase life on earth. Global warming was fiction from nuclear power: he is a thing man is is increasing death on earth! Go past Chernobyl or Fukushima. Or Windscale or …

Sunday, 29 January 2012

A static trace gas

29 January 2012
Every academic professional was taught in high school biology, that photosynthesis controls the level of carbon dioxide globally. Cities and towns are too minuscule an area to affect the global average.
So every academic professional on this planet knew that global carbon dioxide levels can rise. Supposed level changes in cities are of no consequence. The date are on high levels never comes the date or location information.
Even in cities carbon dioxide levels for also global average of two parts per 1,000,000. Bubbles of 300 parts per million, are just stupid! They could never be maintained, or even reached in city centres in the rush hour near diesel exhausts.
These numbers of pure fabrication to benefit the interests of nuclear power-the most toxic industry on earth! Go past Chernobyl and Fukushima.
Fukushima happened after 35 years of safety improvements. A just demonstrated that the world should not tried to two nuclear fission. Which is why Japan and Germany no longer do.
The most fascist societies on earth think nuclear fission is too dangerous. It is also too expensive, polluting and toxic!
EDF of a second largest nuclear company on earth. And they want to build new nuclear power plants in England. They have no hope. Global warming and man made climate change are based on a biologically impossible rise of carbon dioxide in the air.
All the academics who have ever written papers on man made climate change have no place in education. Institutions employing them also have no place in education.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

The death of higher education

29 January 2012

All the fossil fuels carbon date to 65 million years ago. In late Jurassic there was 65% more life on earth even than their is today. Sea levels were 60 metres lower.
Before the fossil fuels formed, and all that carbon was circulating in the environment; there were natural ice ages.
The people who got the money into publicising man made climate change through increasing levels of carbon dioxide where nuclear power.
They totally ignored photosynthesis: which transformed additional carbon dioxide into extra life on earth. Man can not increase the level of carbon dioxide in the air! He can only increase the amount of life on earth.
By releasing that fossilised carbon, that died with the dinosaurs: burning this fossilised life releases carbon dioxide-the gas of life.
Carbon dioxide has remained A static trace gas. His level has not increased due to man. Ever. We are headed into the next little ice age now. Apparently man made climate change is nuclear speak for a natural ice age.
It has nothing to do with are burning carbon fuels. Which increases life on earth; but according to Harvard University had no effect on global average carbon dioxide levels around the world.
Level rises in cities are transient, and too minuscule an area to have any effect, potentially, on the weather systems. As there is no have been a level rate increased due to man it is totally impossible to predict this would impact the weather.
Through history biologists would ensure you that global climates relate to predictable solar cycles; and or not, related to the natural carbon dioxide levels in the air.
Academics have spent the last 35 years spurting rubbish about carbon dioxide and the world climate. They you want students to take huge amounts of money to study at universities.
That no less about the carbon cycle than high school students do. They have found fortunes spurting biological nonsense. Why would anyone be in their right mind wants to study in tertiary education?

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Saturday, 28 January 2012

Carbon is life

By JonThm9@aol.com
In the late Jurassic all the fossil fuels were circulating the environment: oscillating between carbon dioxide and carbohydrates. Then a comet hit in Mexico. 85% of life on earth died-including the dinosaurs.
Their carbohydrates abducted to the deep and formed the hydrocarbons: there we are now extracting and burning. Releasing that carbon back into the environment. 2010 Harvard University put on record that plant yields had increased by 15% last two centuries. But free carbon dioxide in the air has not increased says levels fell at the end of last ice age.
RE read that sentence! Carbon dioxide was last higher in the little ice age. It is a climate follower, going up in an ice ages. In the Permian mega ice age of prehistory it was at five times the present level.
The global average carbon dioxide level is two parts per 1,000,000- 0.0002%. It is the a static trace gas. The weather systems would only be affected by a very global average. Potentially. We have no way of knowing. Carbon dioxide has been static since the ending of the little ice age.
Who made up global warming? They paid stooges to nuclear power. As the global climate cooled from 1998 they shifted tack to man made climate change. Never actually worked out the details. Never actually realised the carbon dioxide levels are static because of photosynthesis.
Since when did you take environmental advice from nuclear power? And professors of physics in their pay. Global warming was obviously biologically impossible. Man made climate change is likewise impossible.
People who believe this rubbish chose seek medical help.

Wednesday, 25 January 2012

We live in the fusion age

25 January 2012
In heavy rain the water drops collide so strongly some of them convert into helium and oxygen gases plus loads of heat and gamma wave radiation!
Their helium and oxygen are as ons! Which is why the air crackles with electricity. The positive helium carriers its charge to above the clouds. The negative falls to the ground! So a rain storm is like a massive battery.
When we have built up 5000 volts of charge we get a lightening strike! This forms five tonnes of helium gas, and gives off massive amounts of nuclear radiation while producing oxygen.

So in three seconds we generate a million, million, million times the air to see than mankind has ever generated. And there is one lightening strike every 3 minutes around the world.
We lose the inert helium to space, and breathe in the oxygen! This fertilises the ground to allow plants to grow: and so support all animal life on earth!
So a lightning strike is powered by a rain cloud: and turns regular water into inept helium and oxygen gases. And liberating massive amounts of energy.
No carbon dioxide, and no toxic plutonium! Nuclear fusion from regular water! The

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Tuesday, 24 January 2012

Rain does fusion

By JonThm9@aol.com

Heavy rain produces heat and gives off nuclear radiation. It produces helium and free radical oxygen: the latter bonds with molecular oxygen to form ozone. We get the same effect at waterfalls or in the countryside.
It is nature doing molecular nuclear fusion from water: the rain drops collide as they fall to Earth and overcome the strong atomic force for hydrogen, so we form helium and oxygen. Plus loads of heat!
H2O->He+O+E+L+γ
This is the most important heat system for biology: even solar radiation does molecular nuclear fusion as he passes through moist air or falls into bodies of water. We get 2x1015 Watts of heat a day from this system. This masterly dewarfs all man is power plants!
It produces no carbon dioxide and no toxic plutonium, we can do it via a helical turbulence of high pressure water-Prof Zimmerman as idea! Are via a steam plasma in a tube-my idea copying lightning!
One of the most effects of rain doing nuclear fusion, is that it fixes the organic nitrogen that life needs! And it is carried down to earth via the rain storm.
Nature does so much molecular nuclear fusion; why has no scientist notice before?

Personal power plant

24 January 2012
My time working on Tandem fault tolerant minicomputers makes me like the idea of a small personal power plant power by three small steam plasma tubes.
Lightning shows the exothermic nature of steam plasmas: that turn regular water into helium, oxygen and a lot of heat! With some minor powered gamma wave radiation. They do molecular nuclear fusion from water.
Three eights war tubes could par an light a whole street off water. Using technology that is 60 years old. No carbon dioxide or toxic plutonium.

Monday, 23 January 2012

Before the fossil fuels

23 January 2012
Fossil fuels all carbon date to the death of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago air. Then sea levels were 60 metres lower, and there was 65% more life on earth.
The main growing covering was found rather than grass. So subtly more carbon dioxide in the air. Nearly as much as in the little ice age. Free carbon dioxide only rise is in ice ages, when there are fewer plants metabolising carbon dioxide.
Usually green plants metabolise all carbon dioxide from the air down to 2ppm: building carbohydrates, and excrete ink oxygen.
They more circulating carbon dioxide there is in the environment, the more life their ears on earth. But there is no more carbon dioxide in the air in a temperate period and the has been for the last two centuries.
So man has increased life on earth. Though he has not increased carbon dioxide in the air! So obviously not increased carbon dioxide in the seas.
As any chemist would tell you, the seas are dioxide to PH7: by all the carbon bicarbonate produced as shells ice life. The seas, even without photosynthesis are covered neutron.
Even without the seas the carbon dioxide level in the air is fixed by photosynthesis. So man has no control over the level of carbon dioxide in the air.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Mankind’s fusion

23 January 2012

Burning hydrocarbons all carbohydrates was away at mankind found to do nuclear fusion. If you add up the enthalpy for the unburned fuel, and the some of the ample free of the produced components-carbon dioxide and steam; burning these fuels should be endothermic.
Use of a Geiger counter proves that burning these shales produces nuclear radiation. But this is outside the frequency of electro magnetic radiation which is produced by chemical reactions.
In particular, visible light is too energetic! Chemical reactions can only be used low infra red light. Chemist have ignore this fact, as anybody knows their candles give off light! But the energy change of oxidising carbohydrates should produce a black flame! The last to do exist!
It is the molecular nuclear fusion that produces so much energy, we get gamma wave or X ray radiation. A simple gas flame should not emit heat. But it does.
Such basic science, when I queried this in 1983 I was told ‘gas flames produce heat and light! So there is obviously stuff we don’t know!’
I think a nice little paper on the gamma wave radiation of hydrocarbons planes would be a really useful thing to do now!
As it demonstrates that molecular nuclear fusion is happening in the kitchen and a you now. Producing no toxic radioactive waste product. The 3He decays in 0 004 seconds.
Molecular nuclear fusion is done by all organisms on earth! As Dr. Dyer pointed out, all life produces light as it metabolises its paid. All life also gives off gamma wave radiation and heat. Why are excreting helium gas.
Incidentally man is production of carbon dioxide has resulted in an increase in life on earth. So no more carbon dioxide in the air, so no more carbon dioxide in the sea either.
Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Sunday, 22 January 2012

Biological MNF & γs

22 January 2012

So are also the disciplines of biology, chemistry, and physics and engineering. The disparate crew know part of the story, but have never linking altogether!
Physics maintains nuclear fusion requires 10 atmospheres, and 10,000,000° C. V10 million degrees C is a product of nuclear fusion! The pressure and which we see nuclear fusion on earth is only two atmospheres.
Physics also maintains that you need atomic hydrogen. Chemistry teaches that you need atoms of hydrogen, but they can be bonded in molecules! Strictly, fusion of any element below iron will release energy.
So must demonstrate that nuclear fusion from hydrogen and helium is required to sustain A sun’s gaseous bulk. I was taught 30 years ago that iron suns letter the cosmos, as non radiant, thermally contracted sphers.
There is no need to invoked a black hole, an iron sun will act as a super dense sources of gravity. That is non radiant. Above iron, nuclear fission releases heat. Only at uranium is is sufficient to be worth the effort. It produces toxic strontium and plutonium. So is a really bad idea! And don’t remind me, that during my time at Inco I made forgings for nuclear power.
I was not told this until after I had signed for sponsorship. This is why Inco and myself parties on my graduation.
Will Zimmerman providing me with the equation for the kinetic interaction of turbulence. I must look up the interactive force for gas plasmas! As this MPS to be the most engineering useful form of molecular nuclear fusion.
Life on earth exists down to 3° C, in the deep dark oceans! As Dr. Dyer has pointed out to me, all organisms on earth generate light at some level.
As he is not aware physics, it will be a surprise to him to loan that this is symptomatic of all biological organisms on earth do molecular nuclear fusion! We can roar out toxic nuclear fission.
I already knew that all life on earth produce gamma wave radiation and excreted helium and free radical oxygen gases. This is the chemistry link again! Mixed in with a bit of physics.
All life on earth turns regular water into gaseous helium and free radical oxygen. While liberating gamma wave radiation and loads of heat.
Plants do this via photosynthesis: my biology teacher referred to the photosynthetic organ as the photo blast. But other people refer to his as the photo plast. I have both are mutually understandable.
Animals and bacteria do molecular nuclear fusion at their mitochondria. It is the same process:
CO2+3H2O->CH4 the+He+3P+E+l+γ
Other biological systems use H2S. When we encounter helium life, we may be amazed at the molecular hydrogen compounds they use. It may be neither carbon or sulphur based.
Photosynthesis is us light initiated biological molecular nuclear fusion: here the lights is in the althorp violent frequency band. We observe again, that we are straddling the disciplines of chemistry and physics.
This is such an important idea! I mentioned in a recent e-mail it was worth in excess of 100 billion dollars a year. It leaves CERN looking very foolish.
Will Zimmerman mentioned to me that fluid turbulence of hydrogen gas might do nuclear fusion. It was not until 2007 that I realized nature used turbulence is steam or high pressure water.
So nature does loads of nuclear fusion! Which is why the natural world is for the release of helium and free radical oxygen plus gamma wave radiation.
This is why water is so important to life! It allows biological organisms to do nuclear fusion.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com T/F

Saturday, 21 January 2012

Fusion in the Deep

21 January 2012
Visible light can only be produced by nuclear reactions. Chemical reactions are not energetic enough. There we do get loads of molecular nuclear fusion is initiated by chemical reactions. So we are used to like being produced so personally by chemical reactions: this produces helium and gamma wave radiation, so they are really initiating nuclear fusion.
As I have been telling you for four years, life in the deep makes a habit of producing light flashes. They also produce helium and gamma wave radiation. So bacterial mitochondria are doing molecular nuclear fusion. This is damn interesting!
So biology turns out to more important for nuclear fusion on earth and physics is. Helical turbulence produces 2D kinetic interactions. A gas plasma releases 3D interactions.

The emission of nuclear radiation and gas plasma is is on record. I was in the 1980s! No scientist have done any work on this issue.
All suns in the universe uses a hydrogen or helium plasma to do nuclear fusion. This is why a sun’s Corona is warmer than the suns interior.
Life in the deep is the most accessible source of nuclear fusion we can study. Freezing by visible light and nuclear radiation: usually gamma wave radiation here.
If we send some biology is on a field trip down with a Geiger counter, we prove molecular nuclear fusion: for which Sheffield University still owes me a Ph.D.!
I am looking at studying the environment at Manchester University, as this would allow me to continue my work with the BBC gospel choir. And my folk group. Hopefully this summer will record a third album!
Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Fusion on earth

By JonThm9@aol.com

It is so obvious! If we have a kinetic interaction with exposed hydrogen is bound up in molecules, above the strong atomic force for hydrogen you will get nuclear fusion; forming helium and you have loads of heat!
Electrons are also incident on the exposed protons, to form neutrons! These wander off, bonds with other nuclei, and cause them to fission! And any atom gives off heat as it fissions! Converting the surface neutron into loads of light and heat.
We see this at waterfalls, green crops in light, animal blood systems-the usual suspects! It contributes 1050 Watts of heat to nature every year. This is a damn load of heat! With no carbon dioxide or toxic plutonium! For free.
Molecular nuclear fusion goes on as your heart beats! Which is why you breathe out helium-though you don’t breathe any in!

Friday, 20 January 2012

The diesel cycle

By JonThm9@aol.com
If you hold a flame of a diesel fuel in the air, nothing happens. If you compress a tearful air mixture and compress it slowly, nothing happens.
But if you compress air, and then inject diesel fuel into the pressurised air we get ignition! With the release of heat, light and nuclear radiation. But visible light and nuclear radiation are only produced by nuclear reactions. And we have virtually no radioactive isotopes around.
The release of radiation is linked to the ignition! Ignition produces some helium gas! He’s has converted solar hydrogen ions from the diesel fuel into helium. Is has done molecular nuclear fusion.
To increase the power we produce from a unit of diesel fuel, we should titanium plate the working surfaces of the diesel engine. Burning hydrocarbons all carbohydrates does molecular nuclear fusion! Producing light and nuclear radiation.
Diesel fuel is not volatile. Only doing MNF if we pressurise the air, and inject this steam into the pressurised air! A working petrol or steam engine also does molecular nuclear fusion.
A modern steam turbine uses nickel alloy turbine blades, to have strength at higher temperature than we can get. A titanium turbine. But titanium is an Face Centred Cubic the metal, which is why a handful forms aluminium alloy! Which have strength at the required temperatures.
We should titanium plate the steam inlet side of the nickel blades. This will give twice the power output, while benefiting from the high temperature strength of the nickel turbine blades.

Thursday, 19 January 2012

Nuclear objectors

19 January 2012
Environmental charities should identify possible sites for a nuclear store in Cumbria. They should then go and get signatures in the local air of people thereCold jet to site a scheme.
100 project is locally will block the flows of nuclear power under European human rights laws. Anywhere within 30 kilometres of a proposed nuclear store, even warmer signature will block the most toxic ambitions.
Cumbria has massive tourism, such a scheme will potentially cause a nuclear disaster in the area of special beauty.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Nuclear fusion is death

19 January 2012
They have found injecting steam into shales are over four will release 1000 years of natural gas. This is massively cheaper than nuclear power.
The latter produces toxic plutonium, while generating massively expensive electricity. They need to build a store for this, for 100,000 years! Fukushima shows that such the store can release nuclear waste into the groundwater.
In an area of outstanding natural beauty! One earthquake and nobody could counter Cumbria for 100,000 years. An underground store would have to use it 30 kilometres away from in the objector.
Or we would infringe on their basic human rights. And remember, this is for uneconomic power. That is a massive vote loser! Will find other areas of underground shales at we can frac, so there is no conceivable reason to do nuclear fission for 500,000 years.
But lightening has shown us that a syllable team plasma turns regular water into inept helium and oxygen, and four times as much power as nuclear fission generates.
We can generate power that masterly undercuts even gas power generation! We can vent the helium and oxygen to the air, as the deep sea does today.
The helium is lost to outer space the same day! It reacts with nothing, and as it is heated he will react been no source of sses before it leaves the earth’s atmosphere. No underground store require.
I her plants have stuff on the Internet about molecular nuclear fusion, strangely enough nuclear fission has produced not one comment in the last four years.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

Fixing the truth

17 January 2012
The whole climate change debacle is very interesting: climate change itself does not actually predict anything. After the world started cooling 1998, nobody would ever be stupid enough over to predict global warming ever again. Yet people still making a living from predicting global warming!
I recommend investing a new thermometer: the global climate has been cooling all this millennia!
So you would expect some firm data are on atmospheric carbon dioxide! But photosynthesis ensures this number hasn’t changed for last two centuries. So thank the argument was over.
There are too many jobs resting on the climate debate. So they climate carbon emissions. Which I had devised by the PR Dept of nuclear power. This is like trying to predict or oil usage from the offices of British Gas.
And where do they get the numbers from? A heavy lunch time in the pub: they are guesstimates. They can’t measure real data, far better to fabricated data! That way nobody can contest it.
This approach has been adopted for the last decade, and has been staggeringly successful. But now people are being taxed on it potentially, they will want real data.
Date are which shows a is static level of carbon dioxide in the countryside: and cities are just too small an area to have any effect on the global average.
Harvard University got new scientist to publish this fact August 2010. Every climate pundits in the world weather edit. Not warm and has commented on it in a way! It has been totally ignored. Except by me.
Nature does nuclear fusion from the turbulent flow of steam or high pressure water. This produces inert helium, oxygen and loads of heat. As done by the deep sea. And pills of green crops. And your own beating heart. And water falls…
Nature does not do toxic nuclear fission from uranium and plutonium: the latter is the most toxic substance known to man. And he is the inescapable product of nuclear fission. Bomb technology.
Nuclear power was designed to abuse atomic bombs. Power generation was a later attempt at justifying this toxic process. It does produce power. Massively expensive power. With horrendously toxic waste.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Global impossible

17 January 2012
In the age of the dinosaurs there was 65% more life on earth even than their ears today. When the comet hit in Mexico that life abducted down to the deep, were there carbohydrates transformed into hydrocarbons that are the fossil fuels.
Which is why all coal and oil carbon dates to 65 million years ago: a fact told to every science undergraduate on the planet. So every academic professional knows her fossil fuels are stalled all life from the Jurassic.
August 2010 Harvard University noted the average global carbon dioxide was there no higher than after the little ice age had ended. During an ice ages carbon dioxide levels are higher. It is a climate follower, it does not make the weather.
They also put on record in New Scientist that crop yields had increased by 15%. So all the organic carbon had been taken in to do photosynthesis. Exactly as high school biology teaches.
Man is additional carbon dioxide accounts for 0.0000175% additional carbon dioxide in the air every day. So every day plant growth increases by the amount. That free carbon dioxide in the air is still limited by photosynthesis.
So you are a work as a folk and gospel singer. Every science professional on this planet knows that carbon dioxide could never coals global warming. The period of natural climate warming stretch from 1970 to 1998.
So we have experienced fourteen years of climate cooling. And 200 years of a static level of carbon dioxide in the air. Those are the facts.
There never walls any man made global warming. And they can’t be any man made climate change-what ever that predicts. It is wrong.
As there is no increase of carbon dioxide in the air. That level is fixed by photosynthesis. And most and land surface of the earth is covered by green plants doing photosynthesis.
2004 New Scientist published a figure of 3.7 parts per 1,000,000 of carbon dioxide in the cities. I pointed out on the Internet that this was a very small number. Suddenly we get a lot of five that factor of 100.
So in 200 years carbon dioxide in the city had gone from 2ppm to 3.7ppm. In the next seven years carbon dioxide increased since he 390ppm. No it didn’t. These figures are fabricated. Place, time, and dateless. Sheer fabrication.
Air circulates, so wave from the rush hour at diesel exhausts even in the cities carbon dioxide is at the preindustrial 2ppm.
Why fabricated date are? Winemaker fictitious science? Because nuclear power is desperate to get new plants of death built before existing plants are decommission. It is the last death throw a the most toxic industry on earth.
And the scientists who have been helping nuclear power their PR obviously have no place in education. Governments are no trying to introduce a taxes on carbon.
Only trouble is, average global carbon dioxide is at a free industrial 2ppm. Unless governments are happy the nuclear stooges they should take this nuclear PR into the trash bin. Along with the pseudo scientists.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

The big lie

17 January 2012

High school biology teaches that photosynthesis sets the level of carbon dioxide in the air: extra carbon emissions resulting extra life on earth. Not extra carbon dioxide in the air.
Professors of physics think mankind can affect the level of carbon dioxide in the air. They no less than a 40 old school child! Man can increase life on earth, but the weather was not being affected by mankind’s carbon emissions.
The global climate is controlled by solar emission cycles. Mankind has no input here! Even though use of nuclear fission, there were an abnormal heat import to the climate in the earth, is insufficient to offset the weather. You driving a car as a 0.0000175% to the carbon dioxide in the daily air which is converted into additional plant life.
Apparently professors of physics failed high school biology. There to be fair, says 2003 I have shut up about global warming. Chernobyl happened in 1986; and nuclear power publicised the idea of global warming through additional carbon dioxide emissions.
Totally wrong! To of years later the natural climate started cooling. In 1998-14 years ago. Any person who fought carbon dioxide might have affected the climate, was assured it would warm the air.
When nuclear power started pushing man made climate change in 2005, any person with any residual belief in the scare stories are nuclear power became a sceptic.
Only the people who set taxes for governments had any belief in carbon dioxide affecting the weather. Is just so wrong. Any high school child could set them right about it.
Carbon dioxide drives biology. Predictable solar emission cycles drives the weather. On a 28 year half wave length. This means we are having the climate of 1983.
We have a long term adjustment. 2010 was the most severe winter for 200 years. So happy as we are headed into another little ice age.
Right nor a bit of global warming will be very welcome. The extra carbon taxes are scientifically stupid. Governments should stop acting on behalf of nuclear power.
The most toxic industry on earth: go ask Tokyo about Fukushima. Or Asia about Chernobyl. Or even Cumbria about Windscale.
According to International Atomic Energy Authority Fukushima wasn’t worse release of radiation than Chernobyl. There the radiation went down into the groundwater of Japan rather than into the air all around the world.
This was after 34 years of safety improvements, that was stop another Chernobyl happening. The conformist societies or Japan and Germany have no renounced nuclear power.
Or badly the UK is more stupid. As for France, they were always a lost cause!

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Professors make themselves idiots

Professors of physics and engineering know nothing about biology is carbon cycle: and have been very careful not to ask biology for any help. Biologists have been trying to tell them since 1986 that photosynthesis controls the level of carbon dioxide in the air, more man.
All man can do is increase in he life on earth: The average level of carbon dioxide is controlled by green plants metabolising carbon dioxide. Local increases over cities are too minuscule to affect the weather.
The professors know nothing about the weather either. They did not care. There have been paid by nuclear power to talk about global warming. They didn’t notice this pushes started in 1986-the year are Chernobyl.
They also did notice when 12 years later the global climate began calling. Nuclear power did. They shifted their PR to be climate change. Blaming the natural weather on a biologically impossible increase of carbon dioxide in the air.
The professors also into the swing. No they didn’t care what the natural weather did. Fourteen years ago air started cooling. So a natural weather has been cooling for longer than he was warming.
The only time carbon dioxide levels can rise is in a natural ice age. In the Permian there were twice today’s levels: carbon dioxide has been static for two centuries since then.
In the 1000 year ice age of the Permian carbon dioxide levels for a five today’s paltry two parts per 1,000,000. So we are safe in concluding that carbon dioxide is a climate follower. The axe in tension with the natural weather.
I am waiting for anyone be in the world to save more climate change actually predicts!

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Extra life

17 January 2012
Says green plants evolved six and 50,000 years ago the level of carbon dioxide in the air is controlled exclusively by photosynthesis. All the carbon fuels mankind is now burning where life in the Jurassic, but died when the comet hit near Maxico.
The carbohydrates abducted to the deep and formed the hydrocarbons we know as coal and oil. Natural gas forms as geothermal steam passes over deep earth carbohydrates, and fracs them, forming methane. So even gas carbon dates to 65 million years ago air!
Mankind can not affect the average level of carbon dioxide in the global air. And that is the only number which might have affected the weather. Local variations have no recorded effect on the weather.
The last time free carbon dioxide was at four parts per 1,000,000, was in the little ice age. Since then he’s has fallen to and remained static at 2ppm. The weather has done its saying with a static level of carbon dioxide in the air.
As every science journalist in the world knows.


Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Monday, 16 January 2012

The diesel cycle

By JonThm9@aol.com
As a founder in the Second World War Spain petrol on to red hot metal created a powerful. But sparing diesel oil or metre race top metal produced by the metal: no firewall.
Yes if you compress a break of diesel eight spontaneously ignites! Giving off light and nuclear radiation. But the enthalpy change of oxidising diesel fuel should be enter climate! But your trusty Geiger counter will show the emission of nuclear radiation. The other end of helium gas we produce is a small.
So we are turning hydrogen atoms into helium atoms, from molecular hydrogen: we are doing molecular nuclear fusion. Which he is massively exothermic! And produces explosive combustion.
When petrol engines fire, they give off light and nuclear radiation 10. Though both of these is the province of nuclear reactions, a game they convert some of the hydrogen is into helium and heat. We do molecular nuclear fusion again.
Oxidising Campbell fact is and her family could. But a flame of wax and air does molecular nuclear fusion again! Producing light and nuclear radiation. We also use to flames of carbohydrates and hydrocarbons giving off light we fail to realise that oxidising animal fats would taker in heat.
If it was not for molecular nuclear fusion we are doing, would generate a black flame. If we pump a candle in a bomb car emitter and ignites heat in the chamber, it burns 20 times faster and faster!
A working steam engine turn some of the water into helium and oxygen gases. So the steam cycle also does molecular nuclear fusion! Coincidentally we use a steam cycle to generate power. Even if we initiate the steam cycle. Nuclear fission, the steam cycle the cell does nuclear fusion.
Steam in turbulent flow does molecular nuclear fusion. So every circulating 20% of the steam to a boiler room will maintain steam pressure, and allow us to use the other 80% to generate power-with no fossil fuel burn! With no toxic nuclear fission.
Molecular nuclear fusion turns regular water into helium and oxygen gases plus heat and my Newt amount of low power gamma wave radiation. This I learned in 1983! But he is in no wise financial interest to four that are left in the world to the fact nature does nuclear fusion-in or flames of carbohydrates for hydrocarbons, and hot smokers in the C.
Bubbling steam into high pressure water generates massive heat, with light on the power gamma radiation. Is also turns regular water into helium and oxygen gases.

Sarkosy is finished

Nicholas Sarkosy said if France loses its trupple A rating, he is finished. Yesterday France ddi! The only country still with an active nuclear programme.

Nicolas Sarcosi dit, si la France perd sa trupple Une cote, il est fini. Hier France DDI! Le seul pays encore avec un programme nucléaire actif.

Sunday, 15 January 2012

The green gas

15 January 2012
Plants take in carbon dioxide to grow. Nuclear power tried to level carbon dioxide powers and green. It is air move gas, so is the ultimate green gas!
Man has increased the amount of carbon dioxide by 0.0000175% a day for last 200 years. This is less than the environmental noise cause by volcanic eruptions and local forest fire years.
So all the carbon dioxide has ended up as new life. There has been no increase of this gas in the air, and never could be due to mans activities, so there is no weather effect.
That is stupid! Oxygen is the greatest pollutant in earth history! That is destroyed serious wine. We are blinded so this because we metabolise oxygen. That is why animals evolved.
Their biggest mass extinction of prehistory was at the end of cretaceous, cause by two little carbon dioxide in the air. So the plant of plants and animals was altered to ensure there was more carbon dioxide in the global air.
Nuclear power is the most toxic, polluting and fatal industry that is all being developed. It is the ultimate them green technology: in fact it just kills everything! In an uneconomic way.


Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Carbon dioxide is green

By JonThm9@aol.com
Green plants take in carbon dioxide during the day to do photosynthesis. They build plant bulk and excrete oxygen. Man is additional carbon dioxide has been 0.0000175% a day over the last two centuries.
So carbon emissions increase life on earth. As we get more plants, we also get more animals to balance them out. 80% of the carbon dioxide in the air today is a result of animals exhaling the gas.
Man has had actually increased the level of carbon dioxide in the afternoon air. He has just increased the amount of life on earth. There are more plants taking in carbon dioxide.
Nuclear power postulated that burning the fossil fuels increased the level of carbon dioxide in the air. They are so obviously did not know their biology. The fossil fuels formed from the 85% of life on earth which died with the dinosaurs.
By burning the fossil fuels we increase the amount of life in the environment: we are steadily returning that life to the surface of the earth. As Harvard University put on record 2010 mankind has not increased the level of carbon dioxide in the air.
He has increased crop yields by 15%. So he is not affected the climate! If you look back to the Jurassic there were massive deciduous forests at the poles. And rainforest at the equator where there are no deserts.
So there was more life and MSN temperate climate! All over the earth. There was no nuclear fission going on. That is just too toxic! Only mankind does it. Windscale ,Chernopyl and Fukushima shows the folly of this idea! And carbon dioxide is death.
Burning fossil fuels is green! Increases life on earth! Nuclear power has spent ¼ billion dollars telling the world the carbon dioxide production is an green. They should read up on photosynthesis! Oxygen is the greatest pollutant in earth history. Carbon dioxide is plant food!

Nature is doing nuclear fusion

By JonThm9@aol.com

When ever we smell ozone in nature away from electrical switchgear, we can be sure that nature is doing molecular nuclear fusion from water:
H2O+O2->He+O3+E
So at waterfalls, in the countryside, animal blood systems, breaking waves and deep water. But the most exothermic time using heavy rain will make a lightning. Heavy rain does molecular nuclear fusion.
The helium is produced as Alpha particles, which gather above the clouds with a positive charge. The fragments of the water molecules fall to the ground taking a negative charge with them. When we get a potential of 5000 volts we get a lightening down strike. That is ½ MW of charge carried by the gentle drift of electron holes to the ground.
We then directly connect the charge arrears, and a massive current flows from the ground to the clouds. That is 3x1039 Watts in size! That is more energy than man has generated since he evolved. We get one lightning strike every 3 minutes around the earth.
That is most important Energy System on earth. It produces inert helium and ozone! The latter is a natural fluid should, we have all experienced in the countryside on the bridge. So safe, clean and free. Going on from regular water!
We do not need to burn fossil fuels all do toxic nuclear fission from uranium: they are expensive, and latter is polluting and fatal and uneconomic. Nobody in their right mind wants it the same continent as them!
Your own beating heart does molecular nuclear fusion. Which is why you breathe out helium, methane and ozone. Without us noticing, nature gets 1044 Watts of energy for every day from molecular nuclear fusion.
You can take your poles with a Geiger counter: you give out a low power gamma wave radiation as you heart does nuclear fusion!

Saturday, 14 January 2012

Real science

14 January 2012
see http://youtu.be/a3UoAl93eOU
It is so obvious: plants take in all the available carbon dioxide to do photosynthesis. They only leave two parts per 1,000,000 carbon dioxide in the evening air around the world.
Harvard University checked this out, presumably using ice core samples. Which Al Gore serve her simply examined 15 years ago. They found the same trace of carbon dioxide in the air around the world outside of cities.
And cities are such a minuscule area and no global significance. Outside of the rush hour cities display the the same carbon dioxide levels as the rest of the world. An under changing 2ppm since the little ice age ended.
Carbon dioxide levels can only rise in a natural ice age, when there is less world photosynthesis going on. So mankind has boosted life on earth but he’s carbon dioxide has had no effect on the global weather.
Nothing mankind can to is large enough to affect the weather: not even the heat generated from nuclear power stations: as nature does not do nuclear fusion if we can help it!
Carbon dioxide drives biology. Historically it follows the natural climate. It never makes the weather. That is such a stupid idea! Any academic giving house room to man made climate change should ponder that this contradicts man made global warming.
And get the hell out of education to work on earth by doing fiction career.
by JonThm9@aol.com

Friday, 13 January 2012

The next ice age

By JonThm9@aol.com

1976 academics were confidently predicting the next ice age. They got the hottest year since 1938. So they shut the hell up for 10 years. Then the world suffered Chernobyl. And nuclear power use the academic stooges to tell people the world was inevitably warming.
The UK is now a Salford for washout science on the trot. The world has been cooling since 1998. 2010 was the worst winter in the northern hemisphere for 200 years. My PH D supervisor fuels that the world thinks academics don’t know what they’re talking about. They do not.
So into what they say, and the weather will do exactly opposite. High school biology has been teaching German for 80 years that green plants convert all the available carbon dioxide into new life on earth.
For only 10 million UK pounds a year academics were totally happy to write that mankind has increased the level of carbon dioxide in the air, by burning the fossil fuels that formed when the dinosaurs died. By now 65% more life on earth.
The carbon dioxide level in the air is fixed by photosynthesis. We will get that life back in time. Carbon dioxide will only rise in a natural ice age. Any academic who tell you otherwise obviously has no place in education. I would have no confidence in him as the primary school milk monitor.
They can’t even write very convincing fiction!

Global Warming impossible

By JonThm9@aol.com
Over 200 years mankind has increased the amount of carbon dioxide available for photosynthesis by 20%: that’s right, there is no more carbon dioxide in the air than after the level fell at the end of the little ice age.
Carbon dioxide levels can only rise in an ice age, when there is less photosynthesis: it follows global cooling! This equates to 0.0000175%. This is not pumping out. This is so minuscule nature will not even have noticed that man has evolved.
Mankind’s machines increase life on earth: Harvard University says crop yields have increased by 15% since the industrial revolution, which means non crop plants have increased by five per cent.
Nuclear power made up global warming to distract the world from Chernobyl. They have been massively successful! For only 10 million UK pounds a year. National governments have invested 10 billion dollars a year, as there is so much employment tied up by the nuclear industry.
It is just a shame nuclear power is so toxic, polluting and expensive. ED air have disguise the last point by the storage of plutonium spent fuel rods at Sellafield. All French nuclear says used fuel rods to store in Cumbria: help, one decent earthquake and the north of England is toast. Self illuminating toast.
Meanwhile nature does molecular nuclear fusion-turning water into inept helium, oxygen gas and heat. For free. A steam plasma tube will allow mankind to tap into this limitless power supplied. A safe and clean Power System. Leaving carbon dioxide to biology.
High school biology teaches that man can not increase the level of carbon dioxide in the air. Only increase or decrease life on earth. The industrial revolution has increased life on earth. Coincidentally, nuclear power kills it!

Kinetic fusion of water

13 January 2012

Where ever we have that kinetic interaction of high pressure water, we see the creation of helium and oxygen gases, gamma wave radiation and heat.
We do molecular nuclear fusion:
H2O->He2++2OH-+E+γ 2OH-+O2->H2O+O3
We often see the emission of visible light and pressure waves. Heavy rain does this, as do waterfalls breaking waves all the whole or biology! Molecular nuclear fusion releases 2x1015 Watts of heat a day.
We lose all the helium to space the same day, but there is still to our times as much helium in the air your breathing than there is carbon dioxide. The level of carbon dioxide in the air is controlled exclusively by photosynthesis.
All mankind can do is very the amount of life on earth. Since the industrial revolution life on earth has increased by 15%. But according to Harvard University the average level of carbon dioxide in the global air has not alter!
Molecular nuclear fusion generates inert helium and oxygen. You’re either in the oxygen and we lose the helium to space. No plutonium or toxic death here!
And it is free. Nuclear fission is the most energetic, produces plutonium and strontium and and is horrendously dear: EDF has hit in the later by storing used fission tubes in water baths around the world.
Sellafield in Cumbria is now the world’s largest repository of fuel grade plutonium. One earthquake, and the north of England is uninhabitable for 100 thousand years.
Summer fusion uses radio and sound waves to set up a bead of light in a water bath. There is no combustion or nuclear fission going on. We are seeing molecular nuclear fusion in action.
In time the water via will generate helium and oxygen gases, and life gives off gamma wave radiation-only possible from nuclear reactions!
Welcome to the fusion age! Nontoxic and free.
by JonThm9@aol.com

Proving molecular nuclear fusion

13 January 2012
I heard about the light emission of boiling water whereas at Sheffield University 2001. At the time I could not understand it. No it makes perfect sense. It proves molecular nuclear fusion.
At the same time I heard that steam rounding a sharp bend is off light. It is see no possible reason for this, as I do not think you are MNF until 2003.
So if we put the fibre optic camera into existing steam line in an engineering plant, as a steam rounds a bend we should C the emission of visible light.
Alternatively, we construct a convoluted steam pathway with glass piping. And pumping steam around it. We can then use a star has photograph a light metre to measure the emission of light.
We are obviously return the steam to a holding chamber. We want to on to sample the lightest gas. This will consist of helium and oxygen gases.
Geiger counter will show the emission of nuclear radiation: but visible light itself can only be produced by nuclear reactions.

Thursday, 12 January 2012

Photosynthesis dummy!

By JonThm9@aol.com

The most important Energy System on earth is photosynthesis: this takes in carbon dioxide and water and uses carbohydrates and excrete the surplus oxygen. At the end of the cretaceous there was two little carbon dioxide in the air.
Mike only got around this by increasing proportion of animals metabolising waste gas of plants-or oxygen. And combining it with eatin plant matter and exhaling more carbon dioxide.
This has the effect that carbon dioxide in the air is at and fixed level during a warm period. It can only rise in an ice ages! When there is less photosynthesis going on.
The amount of photosynthesis proportional to the carbon dioxide in the air. As New Scientist published 2004 global average carbon dioxide has been fixed since the ending of the little ice age at two parts per 1,000,000. During the ice age it was at 4ppm.
In the mecher ice age of the Permian it was at 10ppm. It is safe to conclude that carbon dioxide does not coals global warming. That it is a climate follower. And the essential gas of life.
Climate pundits are coating values of 300ppm. So they are obviously taking her hair samples at diesel exhausts. Air circulates, and once over the countryside it is back to 2 theppm. It is the global average which might potentially have affected the weather.
But carbon dioxide is a static trace gas in the global air. So obviously has no impact on the weather. 300ppm is 0.003%. So even this inflated value would have no effect. We get more carbon dioxide with forest fires and volcanic eruptions. There is no recorded case of a sudden he wave after a forest fire.
A sudden burst of plant growth is an effect of forest fires. Think of it this way: no carbon dioxide at 300ppm, grass would grow by 10 centimetres a night. Rather than to millimetres a month. So climate pundits are obviously in need of serious medical attention.
Also stop being paid by nuclear power-which are actually amounts to the same thing!

Wednesday, 11 January 2012

The most important

11 January 2012
Most important Energy System for biology is photosynthesis: when green plants take in carbon dioxide. Make carbohydrates and excrete oxygen.
And this system also produces helium and gamma wave radiation, as he is a form of biological molecular nuclear fusion. He each day earth gets 2x1015 Watts of power from this Energy System.
In the Jurassic there was 65% more life on earth. All the fossil fuels formed from eatand 5% of life which died with the dinosaurs. So there is a massive headroom for photosynthesis.
All fossil fuels used to life in the time the dinosaurs: hence the name!
Man made climate change is fiction from nuclear power, as the world cooled naturally from 1998. So global warming ended last millennia.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

The Carbon sink

11 January 2012
For 15 years people have been on about carbon sinks. The most important, dynamic, adaptive sink is photosynthesis.
Every day plants grow to absorb the available carbon dioxide: that is a limit to life on earth. At the end of the cretaceous animals evolved to be more important and the carbon cycle.
Metabolising oxygen and eating plant bulk to breathe out carbon dioxide. We teach at high school pupils and at this.
Their sides of the carbon cycle actually do molecular nuclear fusion. How can all professors of physics, engineering and chemistry have missed this?
It means that man has no control of the carbon dioxide levels in the air. All he can do is very the life on earth. Burning the fossil fuels RE establishes the life that died with the dinosaurs.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Plasmas and nuclear fusion

11 January 2012

In regular atoms the protons and electrons kept of plants by kinetic forces: the electrons are all working around the protons.
The neutrons form part of the nucleus: they are composite particles of protons bonded to a transf. They don’t move: so they are locked in a matrix with a proton. Electrons and protons don’t annihilate; whereas electrons and positrons would!
I don’t know negatively charged static subatomic particles, and a fast moving positive subatomic particle. That is a requirement for antimatter to stable. Last I heard, with only managed to produce helium antimatter.
In the plasma the kinetic separation does not apply. However atoms are mostly empty space. So there transf hurtled towards the proton, and miss. So we get loads of heat and visible light.
We also get nuclear radiation: what does have a light is beyond the energy release of physical interactions, so he is a type of nuclear radiation anywhere! We usually get gamma wave radiation though X ray radiation is also possible.
A plasma tube also heats up: exactly as expected.
Only occasionally doing get doubt proton and electron into action. As mentioned above; we then form a neutron. With associated liberation of heat and nuclear radiation. This is the energy equivalent of electrons moving close to the speed of light.
As neutrons they do not move at all. So we get energy liberation. We reduce the atomic number of the aroun by one, and raise its neutron count by one.
So we produce A radioactively unstable element. This is going to fission; liberating one or more neutrons as nuclear radiation, light and heat.
When we get a direct nuclear interaction, we get nuclear fusion. Which up to iron their rates energy. It is the only because of the liberation of free neutrons conversion of neutrons into heat, nuclear radiation and light that the nuclear fission is exothermic too!
So the plasma gives us loads of nuclear interaction, plus a little neutron formation with associated nuclear fusion and fusion.
The amount of interaction we get is linked to the temperature, but natural to the applied pressure! Lightning bolts show us that a mixed steam air plasma causes nuclear fusion.
Each lightning bolt produces five terms of helium gas, with associated free radical oxygen from regular water. This is why we’ve form ozone.
We experienced the same at waterfalls, breaking waves, deep water, in photosynthesis an animal blood systems. All areas of molecular nuclear fusion.
A steam plasma is the most useful form of MNF to drive man is machines. The emission of nuclear radiation from a gas plasma has been known about since the 1950s.
The emission of helium by nature is written up in the environmental text books.
Direct solar radiation produces 1.2x1060 Watts of heat every day. A natural MNF produces 2x1044 Watts of heat. Directly targeted to within biological organisms. Most of solar radiation falls on barren land and sea.
So molecular nuclear fusion is the most important Energy System for biology. It can be used to replace all burning of fossil fuels, and all toxic nuclear fission.
Bubbling steam through water at the boiling point does molecular nuclear fusion. And produces more steam than we used to stop the system. As I said in 2003 we use some of steam to maintain the process, and use the rest to generate power.
With no fossil fuel burn and no use of polluting metal oxide fission tubes. Such a system produces clean, safe name free power. I first suggested this idea eight years ago!
If I went and resume my PH D I would be discarding eight years and my life. And ignoring my singing career this is no getting started!
The steam plasma idea would allow us to replace metal fission tubes. The bubbling steam through liquid water and would allow us to safely reprocess fission tubes.
The MNF of their rates neutrons. These bond with the plutonium or strontium, and caus nuclear fission into nucleuses that her massively shorter half lives!
So we could render them safe or toxic waste from nuclear power. We then use MNF as an energy source directly. And generate power with production of inept 3helium and 18oxygen. As produced by fields of green crops.
Waterfalls produce very low levels of strontium. But later waterfalls will cause this element to fission into safer atomic numbers. F
If I resumed my PH D now, I would be inviting the academic institution to restrict access to my ground breaking ideas. Stead for two years to give people ideas via the Internet.
Life old university also urged me a PhD from 2001: such a qualification would have totally answers my life. And also the lives of everybody alive today!
I am staggered that professors of physics have totally ignored photosynthesis, the most important biology on earth, in formulating their ideas of man made global warming. As the world cooled they changed it to climate change: which contradicts global warming! As the world has been cooling since 1998.
Photosynthesis describes have biology metabolises carbon dioxide to form life on earth. It totally prevents any build a of this gas in the air. I have no faith in such scientists.
To ignore biology’s carbon cycle two octane research funding from nuclear power: the most toxic industry on earth. And totally inconsistent with academia.
Jonathan Thomason 117 Merchant’s Quay, Salford Quays Greater Manchester M50 3XQ
JonThm9@aol.com T/F 0161 848-0416

Tuesday, 10 January 2012

Stupid science

By JonThm9@aol.com
Man made climate change is either stupid science says man made global warming: world has been cooling naturally since 1998. Historically carbon dioxide rises only in an ice ages. So on to suggest that carbon dioxide would never warm the air devise historical evidence.
Carbon dioxide tracks plant growth cycles, so likes the climate by four years. It has never had any forcing effect on the climate. How could it? It is a trace gas. Which says it is below any effective level which would affect the weather. That’s going to have a bit more.
Photosynthesis takes in carbon dioxide. So free carbon dioxide in the air runs at the lower limit for photosynthesis. Hence during an ice ages carbon dioxide rises. Otherwise the amount of life on earth is directly proportional to carbon dioxide circulating in the environment.
In the Jurassic there was 65% more life on earth of even their ears today. A lot of ears as forests. Then a comet wiped out 85% of life on earth. The carbohydrates abducted to the deep, and under the anaerobic conditions formed the hydrocarbons.
A lot of fossil fuels are as coal. Formed from the worldwide forests. The oil formed from deep sea life. We got massive abduction of the tectonic plates, and the old sea floors found themselves in the deep magma chambers.
Geothermal steam percolated up through the carbohydrates: a process called for fracking. This turned the carbohydrates into helium and methane: it does deep molecular nuclear fusion. At 250° C. We turn water and carbohydrates into methane, helium and oxygen. The oxygen is water soluble, so when out in the geothermal water.
We are left with pockets are methane and helium. When we extract this gas, it is as natural gas. So the natural gas has helium in it. Though there is no chemical source of helium. And all prehistoric helium would have escaped a space millions of years ago.
Even now geothermal water passes through carbohydrates, and we get methane and helium. So the methane carbon dates to be late Jurassic when there carbohydrates abducted into the deep.
If we have exposed deep platinum the methane linked up to form the long chain hydrocarbons we extract as oil. This means there are 10,000 years of natural gas we can extract through fracking.
But we can do better than that! A steam plasma turns regular water into helium and oxygen gases plus loads of heat. In time the oxygen fissions into beryllium, boron, helium and then the hydrogen fissions into light and heat. This is molecular nuclear fusion. We years a physical variety, like we experience of the deep sea currents, or at waterfalls!
Nature does not do toxic nuclear fission: but all organisms on earth do biological molecular nuclear fusion. Which is why all life produces helium and free radical oxygen. While emitting gamma wave radiation as it produces heat.
Your heart does it as it beats! Nuclear fission is the way of death. Molecular nuclear fusion is the way of life. Four times more energy. And totally nontoxic. It uses regular water rather than enriched uranium.
Game over for nuclear power.

More life

10 January 2012
In the Jurassic all the carbon fuels were circulating around him the environment as organic carbon. It was the mess climate the earth has ever experienced: warmer Poles and a lighter equator. They are fossil fuels formed as the dinosaurs died.
Photosynthesis controls the level of carbon dioxide we C in the global air: and it is the global average that might have affected the weather. Had it not been static since carbon dioxide levels fell at the end of last ice age.
So mankind is burning of fossil fuels has increased life on earth. But as there is no more carbon dioxide in now in the air than last two centuries ago it is obviously not affected the weather.
Which has been cooling unnoticed for 14 years. Man made climate change is fiction from the diseased minds of nuclear power. We should not induce a carbon tax, as carbon is life.
We should introduce a plutonium tax: as plutonium is death!

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Twisted science

10 January 2012
Nuclear power give loads of money to the Chemical Engineering or physics funding bodies. So they totally ignore photosynthesis; and biology is carbon cycle.
This predicts that green plants and light will metabolise all carbon dioxide down to the lower limit for photosynthesis: which is two parts per 1,000,000.
Harvard University has confirmed that the global average carbon dioxide level in the air has not increased since it fell at the end of last ice age: historically carbon dioxide levels only rise during an ice ages.
Physics and chemistry still consider that carbon dioxide can accumulate in the air. It can’t! That is fiction designed to enhance the prospects by nuclear power.
For only ¼ billion dollars nuclear power has neutrons the whole of science! Because no scientist for speaking out against paid research being done by others.
The

Monday, 9 January 2012

Burning fossil fuels is immaterial

By JonThm9@aol.com
In the Jurassic there was 65% more life on earth than their is today. When the comet hit in Mexico 85% of life on earth died. And formed the fossil fuels. We know this, as all the fossil fuels carbon date to 65 million years ago. By burning the fossil fuels we release carbon dioxide. And plants take in carbon dioxide to form life on earth: releasing fossil fuels from the deep tomb.
Over 230 years 20% of the carbon dioxide produced every day, is from man is machines. This represents 0.0000175% a day. This is 1000 times less important than a local forest fire. Such an event he is a massive boost to plant growth. Man’s carbon emissions have barely even register it with nature! They are truly minuscule.
Every day plants around the world grade to take in the additional carbon dioxide. So every morning there are more plants around the world poised to take in the organic carbon. The plants grow, making carbohydrates and excrete ink oxygen. Animals eat the carbohydrates and combine them with the oxygen, so more plants translates directly into more animals.
Man’s burning of fossil fuels has increased life on earth. But as high school biology teaches, the level of carbon dioxide in the air is the lower limit for photosynthesis to take in this gas. Free carbon dioxide only rise is historically in ice ages. Harvard University has confirmed there average global carbon dioxide has not changed since the industrial revolution.
Nuclear power invested ¼ billion dollars in this fiction. Which is so not true! I sent this in 2001, and the Chemical Engineering funding agencies are applied pressure to get my Ph.D. ended. The super ethical funding agencies acted as paid stooges to nuclear power. I am annoyed. But life on earth is safe!
The world has been cooling down 14 years: hence nuclear power no pushes man made climate change. Which doesn’t predict anything. But blames the weather on a biologically impossible increase of carbon dioxide in the air. Apparently they have never heard of photosynthesis.
But of course you have! And realized man made climate change is an impossible oxymoron! Could never happen! Not due to carbon dioxide. Might happen because of man’s use of toxic nuclear fission!

Not pumping out

By JonThm9@aol.com

Mankind is very puny: the dinosaurs rained for 6.5 million years. The whole of human do not society is just at 2,500 years! 80% of the carbon dioxide emitted daily is from animals breathing this gas out. It is why animals evolved!
The mass extinction of the cretaceous killed 90% of life on earth: the most serious mass extinction of prehistory. The death of the dinosaurs only wiped out 85% of life. This formed all the fossil fuels we are now burning. Mankind’s engine’s country 0.0000175% extra carbon dioxide to nature is huge carbon emissions.
This will return life to the surface of the world. But plants taking in 100% of the day the emission of carbon dioxide. And use it for photosynthesis: to create carbohydrates excrete ink the surplus oxygen.
Harvard University found that average global carbon dioxide has not increased since the industrial revolution. But crop yields had increased by 15%! The gas levels in town is too insignificant to affect the global average.
Strangely enough, the weather doesn’t warm by 25° C as interstellar. It warns are at 2° C produced by all the heat generated power mankind as heat is. If you confirm the climate in and out of town, there is no effect attributable to the carbon dioxide.
Gardeners know this! They use a gas flame to boost the carbon dioxide levels and so increase plant growth. But the heat of the flame increases the temperature in the greenhouse, and that increases plant growth.
If you introduce carbon dioxide from the centre, you increase plant growth but do not eat up the air of the greenhouse at all. The term greenhouse gas is from the 1950s film Soylent Green. After Chernobyl nuclear power Samid declare that carbon dioxide was a greenhouse gas. With no scientific evidence to this fact.
Gonna spend a lot of money introducing extra carbon dioxide. Just recently commercial gardens in Holland have started piping the exhaust gases from power stations into greenhouses. Great idea!
Hot, carbon and sulphur dioxide heavy air. For the cost of one pump!
Green plants produce helium and gamma wave radiation as they do photosynthesis: so the latter is really carbon capsized molecular nuclear fusion. Deep. Sea. currents turn water into helium and oxygen gases plus heat and gamma wave radiation. So they do molecular nuclear fusion for free.
Your heart and arteries give off gamma wave radiation as you heart beats. And you breathe out helium gas! So your heart does molecular nuclear fusion. Power with no carbon dioxide or plutonium.
Lightning uses a steam plasma to liberate in three sections more energy than mankind has ever generated! Again for free. Gas Power is massively overpriced. A steam plasma tube will do molecular nuclear fusion for free.
Turning regular water into helium and oxygen gases plus very low power gamma wave radiation and heat: like your beating heart does! Gas and oil are massively overpriced. Nuclear fission is toxic, polluting, fatal and dearer.
Be generating Power Systems are safer, that are available. Molecular nuclear fusion is safe, clean and free. And I have been telling Sheffield University about it says 2003. They are two addicted to the phantom science of man made global warming, ever to notice that photosynthesis make sea of biological impossibility: PR from nuclear power.
Molecular nuclear fusion is the answer to fusion power requirements. Nuclear fission is the answer to persistent life.

the most stupid

9 January 2012

The most. The idea I have heard comLife carbon dioxide would warm the air: gardener is use gas flames to add heat and CO2 to the air. Carbon dioxide had a warming effect they would not use a gas flame.
They would have a cage of rodents: an idea in hot countries.
Green plants convert all available carbon dioxide into carbohydrates and oxygen. At night there reverses cycle, and metabolise a tiny fraction all the oxygen they released during the day.
Global warming was seized on by nuclear power; A room for of physicists! And rule out there and talk about biology or metrology. Two subjects than there were some zero about.
All the academics who wrote papers on man made climate change should no longer be in education. East Sussex university is for our such individuals, and there is no reason to go study there!
Harvard University investigated world wide carbon dioxide levels from 2008. They power in the countryside free carbon dioxide was at the lower limit for photosynthesis: A preindustrial two parts per 1,000,000.
Cities are just too small an area to affect the global average. So since the industrial revolution the weather hasn’t been exposed to a more carbon dioxide. Crop yields have increased though!
By now sea levels should have increased by 18 feet. 25% of England would have forwarded. Television’s would be 25° C hotter all around the world! Though waterfalls and equator.
Yes that sea levels may even have fallen! As all the extra plant growth were tied up rein for and prevented running back into the seas. The world has been cooling for 14 years.
It will next warm naturally in 2026. Though some areas of the world will not experience warming until 2031.
The weather is totally controlled by nature. Plant growth is boosted by extra carbon dioxide. And hence to buy more sulphur dioxide.
Nuclear power and its stooges should be banned for ever from talking about biology’s carbon cycle. If you want to know about biology, as did Harvard! Are real university.
If you want to know about engineering sources of carbon dioxide go ask and engineering university, Mike Sheffield university. They just won’t know anything about carbon sinks.
Earning about the climate. A fact is you want to know about sources of carbon dioxide, there is something very wrong with you! You need to know about the sinks for carbon dioxide.
There are 80 times the required number of plants and bacteria to sink atmospheric carbon dioxide. If you increase the production of this gas by 0.0000175%, you are going to end or the more plants alive.
He were never going to affect world climate! If you believe carbon dioxide doesn’t affect the weather, reset high school biology! And seek treatment.
I am still waiting for my first scientist from around the world to challenge the fact that photosynthesis takes in all carbon dioxide to boost life on earth.
by JonThm9@aol.com

Sunday, 8 January 2012

Fossil fuels were life

By JonThm9@aol.com
I learned on my master’s degree in 1983 that all fossil fuels carbon date to 65 million years ago air. As another guy he noted, this was the death of the dinosaurs. When there was 65% more life on earth are various today.
Climate pundits are for ever saying that we are over loading the carbon system. No. We are living in a time of denuded carbon. We are returning the environment to hire was in late Jurassic. When I was 65% more life on earth, and sea levels were 60 metres lower.
Nuclear power hypothesised that burning the carbon fuels would decrease life and raise sea levels. The historical evidence is exactly the opposite! We will increase life, and as life ties up rain fall in its bulk, lower sea levels.
So 14C dating shows that man made climate change is total fiction. We are restoring life. When there are massive rain forests at the equator, and deciduous forests even at the poles. Which were above sea levels then.
It just shows that nuclear power should never talk biology: they do physics, they are totally wrong about master’s biological. More available from all the academic stooges. Who know the science. And still talk rubbish. And so obviously should not be in education.
As a joke now, they have persuaded politicians there carbon dioxide is deleterious to life. No carbon is life. Plutonium or nuclear power are death.

Tax plutonium

Watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIqoYI83ln0
8 January 2012
As any gardener told year, carbon dioxide stimulates plant growth. There are 80 times the required plants on earth to sink all the carbon dioxide emitted by animals breathing out or from man is machines.
And the plants growing day by day. Man is carbon emissions have increased crop yields by 15%. According to Harvard University, hasn’t increased the level of carbon dioxide in the air.
All the fossil fuels formed former 65% of life on earth had died with the dinosaurs. Then all will RE established that life.
In contrast nature does not make plutonium: just too toxic! Nuclear power intense or store the used fission rods contain plutonium in water baths for 100,000 years.
One decent earthquake or hurricane and the north of England is uninhabitable for 100,000 years. Don’t tax the gas of life! Tax the metal her death! Introduced a Europe wide plutonium tax.
Trying to establish a pointless tax to the benefit of the most toxic industry on earth is stupid and contravenes the statute which drew up the European community: it is illegal. One decent the world challenge, and the EU will have to repay all carbon taxes.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Rain produces heat

8 January
Search for 'JonThm rain' on YouTube.com
Heavy rain turns regular water into helium and oxygen gas, plus a load of heat! It does molecular nuclear fusion.
H2O->He++O-+E
They helium rises to above the cloud tops. And when we have a potential of 5000 volts we get a lightening down strike! This sets up a steam plasma.
This produces in three seconds more energy than man has ever generated. It does more molecular nuclear fusion. Turning regular water into inept helium and oxygen gases.
No carbon dioxide. No toxic plutonium or strontium fission waste.
All biological organisms on earth produce helium and free radical oxygen. There is no chemical source of helium gas. It is produced exclusively by nuclear processes; here molecular nuclear fusion.
This produces power with no carbon dioxide. The proposed European carbon tax is designed to favour toxic nuclear fission. Such a tax contravenes the statute that drew up the European community!
It can be challenged legally in the European courts. Then there will be massive damages are going to all Europeans who have been penalised by this illegal tax. The

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Higher crop yields

8 January 2012
Since the industrial revolution mankind has released an extra 0.0000175% a day for last 200 years.
As Harvard University spent two years investigating from 2008 to 2010 this has increased crop yields by 15%, but not increased the level of carbon dioxide in the air. This is what high school biology teaches you to expect
They can have been no man made global warming or climate change due to the burning of fossil fuels. Only an increase of life on earth!

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com T

Saturday, 7 January 2012

Lightening

7 January 2012
Around the world is one lightening strike every three sections. You are driven by rain storms: which generates helium+ and ozone- gases from regular water and oxygen.
When there is a potential of 5000 volts beating the cloud tops and the ground we get a lightening strike. This generates five terms of helium+ and 18 tonnes of ozone-. This equates to 3x1039 Watts of power for a lightening strike. 2x1044 Watts and nearly. This is one form of molecular nuclear fusion done by nature.
At room temperature and pressure. We do get pressure waves generated of eight atmospheres. We liberate so more light plus nuclear radiation.
Nuclear radiation is the province of nuclear actions: chemical reactions are not energetic enough. But we only have regular water, and no source of combustion.
Knowing this we can design power plants heated by steam plasma tubes. That generates no carbon dioxide or toxic plutonium. They turn regular water into heat.
It suddenly makes the whole of nuclear power redundant. And the European carbon tax is exposed as a nuclear fraud!
That breaks basic anti competition European laws.
Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Stupid

by JonThm9@aol.com

7 January 2012
All science professors were taught at high school and biology is carbon cycle: green plants take in all available carbon dioxide during the day, building carbohydrates and excreting oxygen.
This has the effect that carbon dioxide is limited to two parts per 1,000,000 in the countryside outside an ice age: cities are just too small an area to be important to the climate.
Interestingly enough, climate pundits climate in value of between three and a 40 and 390 parts per 1,000,000. With no location, date or time mentioned. Purely fictitious date. Which is impossible to contest.
But the value in the countryside around the world is 2ppm or year: as confirmed by Harvard University from a survey between 2008 and 2010 and. No climate pundits has never contested the validity of this number. Because it is easy to verify or around the world.
So carbon dioxide has increased plant growth but the static level of this trace gas in the air can have no effect on the climate. No data set the same it dance has ever existed.
Yet for 36 years professors of physics and engineering have spurted rubbish and the climate! They talked about global warming, until the world started cooling 1998.
Now they talk about man made climate change: there is an oxymoron for your! They don’t say what it means, but any weather event can be hailed as proof of the mythical science.
But all professors know that photosynthesis has transformed all man is carbon emissions into additional life on earth. The been no carbon dioxide to affect the climate.
Now we have European Union proposing a carbon tax: the statute that drew up the European community specifically made anti competitive walls illegal. A tax which famous that toxic nuclear power industry is illegal under European law!
All those professors should obviously not be in education: though I was told says 2003 (five years after the world started cooling) or academic work on global warming had ceased.
So it was decided that carbon dioxide do not warm the air! After saying for 25 years that he did! Or rather although as academics the wires nuclear contracts studied rubbish.
Nuclear power is the enemy of life on earth: go ask Fukushima. Or Chernobyl. Or windscale.

Green gas

7 January 2012
Plants take in carbon dioxide to grow: to do photosynthesis. So the levels of this gas in the air have not changed since they fell at the end of the little ice age.
Carbon dioxide is the ultimate green gas. Nuclear power kills all life on earth. The ultimate rate technology.
The proposed carbon tax by the EU is illogical and anti nature. Carbon dioxide boosts plant growth, but obviously has no affect on the weather!
The EU carbon tax breaches the anti competition laws enshrined in the European charter which drew up the EEC.

by Jo thenThm9@aol.com

Anti competitive

7 January 2012
The European anti competition laws make it illegal to introduce a tax which he is a financial advantage to one industry over another: there have to be good reasons for such a tax.
The world has been cooling for 14 years. Free carbon dioxide in the air is limited by photosynthesis; and so has not changed since the ending of the little ice age.
A proposed European carbon tax is as illegal under the EU treaty. It Si eight enhance the prospects of nuclear fission: the most toxic, least popular industry on earth.

Friday, 6 January 2012

Man has increased life

6 January 2012

As any professor of biology does, man is minuscule carbon emissions have resulted in plants growing return for 1/10 second longer a day: this represents 20% of the carbon dioxide plants can take in.
That is an additional 0.0000175% a day for last 200 years. Which has resulted in plants growing: so every day there are more plants to take in carbon dioxide. It is a cumulative amount. Man doesn’t suddenly great carbon emissions on one day.
They have built over two centuries. Meanwhile nature has had forest fires which and 1000 times as important as man is pitifully tiny carbon emissions.
Burning carbon fuels is the best thing man kind has ever done for life on earth. He has increased plants and animals living on the earth.
In the same way nuclear fission is the worst thing man has ever devised: as it is fatal to all life on earth.
Professors of physics talk about the effect of an increasing amount of carbon dioxide in the air. Sorry there hasn’t been one. For the last two centuries carbon dioxide levels in the afternoon air have been controlled exclusively by photosynthesis.
All mankind has done is increase life on earth. Carbon dioxide can only rise in a natural ice age: it follows global cooling.
Nuclear power was scratching around after Chernobyl for any possible reason anyone would ever build a new nuclear power plant. They had invested heavily in education and this was payback time.
They got all the academic stooges, in physics and engineering, to write papers about the effect of carbon dioxide on the weather. Pretty stupid. Carbon dioxide is a static trace gas. There is no more in the air now than after the little ice age had ended.
How doing no carbon dioxide was whether? History shows us that it doesn’t. The only thing which says he does is the diseased minds of paid nuclear stooges.
These are last people we want in education. Global warming was nuclear fiction. Nuclear power will kill us all if we allow them new plants of death to be built.
There is no data set on carbon dioxide affecting the weather: because it doesn’t. It supports all life on earth. Without it there would be no life on earth. With no plants have being aware future free and no food for you to eat.
So you owe your life to the trace of carbon dioxide in the air. Carbon dioxide is life.

Not energetic


A flame of carbohydrates burning in the oxygen should be enter climate: the oxidation of carbohydrates into carbon dioxide and water should take in energy.
How a a flame gives out gamma wave radiation and. This is only possible with massively exothermic reactions. It is the province solely of nuclear reactions. Use of a Geiger counter will demonstrate that this is so.
No part of combustion shows do nuclear stuff. Yet the flame will contain helium gas. There is no chemical source of helium. If we D gas the carbohydrates, will find there is no reservoir of helium gas.
If we burn a candle in a bomb calorimeter we will find the calendar will burn faster, the flame will give out more radiation and the visible radiation will be shifted into the year the range: until the oxygen is depleted.
No flame should give out visible light. But flames of carbohydrates and hydrocarbons do as they do molecular nuclear fusion. This is a nice way to prove MNF.
The NI H has candles and Geiger counters. So it can prove MNF. Sheffield University is ideally placed to research molecular nuclear fusion.
But anyone be in the world with a decent laboratory can do it: all the chemical departments in the world are struggling. This is an area of paid research could save them.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

Life hope

Jonathan Thomason ‘JonThm’ on youtube.com

There were three workhouses: faith is now Morrison’s. Charity was
demolished to make room for Salford’s bypass. Hope is now the finest
possible in the north of England.
They save lives there! Of people in Salford & Manchester etc.. They saved
the life of Chris-who if you knew him needs saving by the week. A really
great bloke! And the poor man is my best friend
He went into Hope, to have his kidneys ultrascanned. They being fairly sure
he was too old to be pregnant that week.
‘do you like rock music?’ The Dr. asked him. ‘it’s just your kidneys are showing
the affect of age and Boddingtons Best, or you like
your music too heavy metal!’ Samid joked with him.
‘no, I playi classical penny whistle!’ Chris informed
him. As they ultrascanned his stomach and chest.
‘great news! Who have no tumous’ he was informed. ‘yes get theatre
three prepped’ the Dr. informed
the intercom. ‘Chris now for emergency surgery’
‘surgery?’ Chris asked. ‘you have a choice’ Chris
was informed ‘emergency surgery to remove
the aneurysm from your coronary artery, or contact your solicitor to
ensure your will is in order’
‘who won their cricket?’ Chris askins 13 hours
later as he regained consciousness.r‘who cares’ said Diane
as she kissed the returning saint. ‘you had two weeks
before the aneurysm bust and killed you’ she informed him.
‘your back with us!’ Samir noted. ‘my boys beat England-
as normal! Serves them right for dropping Amid warm the team’ the Dr. fumed.
‘you are back living! Saving lives is what
we do’ noted Samir ‘I would recommend you have an regular
birth to death examinations though’
‘Why?’ puzzled Chris. ‘we find health checks for the dead
less therapeutically beneficial’ the Dr. as he left
to save another life.
JonThm9@aol.com

Life hope

Jonathan Thomason ‘JonThm’ on youtube.com

There were three workhouses: faith is now Morrison’s. Charity was
demolished to make room for Salford’s bypass. Hope is now the finest
possible in the north of England.
They save lives there! Of people in Salford & Manchester etc.. They saved
the life of Chris-who if you knew him needs saving by the week. A really
great bloke! And the poor man is my best friend
He went into Hope, to have his kidneys ultrascanned. They being fairly sure
he was too old to be pregnant that week.
‘do you like rock music?’ The Dr. asked him. ‘it’s just your kidneys are showing
the affect of age and Boddingtons Best, or you like
your music too heavy metal!’ Samid joked with him.
‘no, I playi classical penny whistle!’ Chris informed
him. As they ultrascanned his stomach and chest.
‘great news! Who have no tumous’ he was informed. ‘yes get theatre
three prepped’ the Dr. informed
the intercom. ‘Chris now for emergency surgery’
‘surgery?’ Chris asked. ‘you have a choice’ Chris
was informed ‘emergency surgery to remove
the aneurysm from your coronary artery, or contact your solicitor to
ensure your will is in order’
‘who won their cricket?’ Chris askins three hours
later as he regained consciousness.r‘who cares’ said Diane
as she kissed the returning saint. ‘you had two weeks
before the aneurysm bust and killed you’ she informed him.
‘your back with us!’ Samir noted. ‘my boys beat England-
as normal! Serves them right for dropping Amid warm the team’ the Dr. fumed.
‘you are back living! Saving lives is what
we do’ noted Samir ‘I would recommend you have an regular
birth to death examinations though’
‘Why?’ puzzled Chris. ‘we find health checks for the dead
less therapeutically beneficial’ the Dr. as he left
to save another life.
JonThm9@aol.com