Sunday, 24 May 2015

Free energy



24 May 2015
                Every 3 minutes somewhere around the world there is a lightening stike!  I is set up by heavy rain doing nuclear fusion from the exposed hydrogen ions in turbulent interaction
                1              H2O+T+O2->He2++O32-+E2+L+Xray             T= turbulence
                So heavy rain exits X rays, light flashes and generates helium and ozone ions.  That is now easy (Molecular) Nuclear Fusion is, it goes off fin heavy rain!  We can easily mist water drops off a university building and study this system.
                The positive charge collects above the cloud layer, and the negative charge is carried to the ground.  When we get a potential of 5,000 V, a partial steam plasma links up electron holes in the air, as it traces a path to the ground.
                Them we get the discharge of 100 amps of charge electrons.
2              H2O+e-+O2->He++O32-+E2+Xray+L
                And ever adult alive has felt the heat and electricity, and smelt the ozone from a lightening strike.  They have seen nature doing nuclear fusion.  This process 5 tonnes of helium ions.  Which relativity tells us is 2.5x1030 W of power.  As light, sound, heat and electromagnetic radiation, including visiuble light.
                So even a patial steam plasma generates more energy in a single lightening stike, thanm man’s power generation – including nuclear weapons:  Excluding H bombs, which do MNF via a uranium bomb in a water tank.  So man started doing nuclear fusion of Earth in the 1950s.
                H bombs use uranium fission to set off MNF.  Which is why they are so energetic.  The Nazis had actually developed a fusion bomb in 1945, but vaporised all their nuclear scientists during testing.
                They did the work at Thuringia.Look it up on the Internet.  But we are not intered in bombs:  A decent MNF bomb would blow the Earth aprt, killing everybody who is alive today.
            We are interest in utilizing this energy source.  We fire up a steam plasma in a glass tube.  We dilute the steam using N, to prevent us extinguishing all life on that helisphere.  We do different physics.
            3          H++e- ->n0     we compact hydrogen ions and free electrons into neutrons.
            4          1H++r n0 ->1+rH+ ->Er3+L+Xray
            5          16O2-+s n0 ->161H++24e-       the oxygen ends up a 16 hydrogens
            6          14N3-+t n0 ->141H+22e-           N also has valency 5
                At  4 atmosphere we found the plasma self sustains!  We couldn’t understand why, we just wanted the lab space to study nuclear fusion.
                Lightening teaches up a partial steam plasma generates 5.8 MW from a 2cm lightening bolt.  1.5 km long.  This si too much heat.
                A 0.5cm x 1 m steam plasma will generates 600 KW once started.  A pulse of 2000 V started it off!  Ok, we were using the electronics from a fluorescent light.  This is equivalent to 8 rows of gas or oil burners.
                A utilizes 1cc of regular water a year.  We only got to run uit for a month, after my Ph.D was ened for no reason.  At the suggestion of present nuclear power:  Who did not want to givethe world free water fusion.
                So very little water, only a pulse of external current to start it off.  Will it run off salt water?  Probably.
                7              Na->111H++7e-
                8              Cl->171H+3e-
                We probably need less N gas here.  Near infinite free power, from very little water.
                So we can utilize one 1/2 cm steam plasma tubes in place of 8 rows of oil or gas burners.  We produce no CO2, or toxic radioactive waste.  And the in-product is free!   And the science was published in the 1950s.
                So known to all university phsics lecturers, before the oil crisis.  And its massive injection of inflation into world economies.  Now oil is basically irrelevant.  It will take a week to work out the details, and this work was done 6 months ago.

Jonathan Thomason       JonThm9@aol.com

No comments: