After 1986 nuclear power was faced with a problem! Chernobyl had caused massive death and a nuclear winter. So it published the idea that burning fossil fuels would warm the weather. Though still not cause massive global death.
And funded world academics to write about CO2 causing 'Global Warming'. Academics will do anything for money, and will not bad mouth another disciple's funded science.
This was stupid science. Global CO2 levels are controlled by photosynthesis on the land and it the seas. If anything, seas are better at metabolising CO2 than the land is.
Some of the deep; coal was laid down at the end of the Carboniferous age. The world carried right on having ice ages and warm periods. So apparently carbon had nothing to do with the climate.
Professors of physics wrote the papers on Global Warming, and had no knowledge of prehistory or biology's carbon cycle.
We reach the Jurassic age, with twice the trace of CO2 in the air. Photosynthesis was less evolved – it left 4 parts per million CO2 in the air.
A generally warm age: spooky! It was almost as if nuclear power had read a book. Impossible, as nuclear scientists do numbers, but can't read.
They should have consulted more talking books on the Internet. There were 3 natural ice ages – when CO2 levels spiked at 8ppm. You begin to see the problem! Photosynthesis decreases, CO2 levels rise.
A comet hit in Mexico and 90% of life on Earth died. Laying down coal deposits:
2 H2O+T+P->H2+O 2O->O2
So the formation of the deep coal lead to the release also of oxygen and hydrogen.
The big one is the formation of oil
3 C+2H2->CH4 natural gas
The to life on Earth is available organic C. So within 5 minutes of the gas, coal or oil being burnt, it is converted into plant biomass. Over the desserts of the world, the gas more towards the seas, and we get the same effect.
We do not get an increase of CO2 in the air! Nature does not allow that. The fossil fuel is converted back into active life. That was my the Jurassic had 65% more life than we have today – though life was less evolved at metabolising C.
So you protest that nature stops an increase of CO2 in the air – and climate change pundits say 'No. All these professors of physics we pay have written documents on it'.
But nature does not allow an increase of CO2! Find me one biologists who believes in Climate Change. The name is interesting. What happened to Global Warming?
'Same thing – only the global climate has unexpectedly cooled for 20 years' nuclear admits. 'So you have no data showing an increase in CO2' I ask. 'In the city in the rush hour' nuclear gloats. 'That is a vanishingly small transient effect – no global calcine is possible!'. 'Oh, I don't want to play any more' protests nuclear .
So nature controls CO2 levels. They rise in natural ice ages – CO2 levels rise in glaciations! This is one of those awkward facts the nuclear money can't change.
Money does not alter the truth. CO2 at 4ppm, rising to 8ppm 4 years into a natural ice age. Carbon is a climate follower.
On a more positive note, a steam plasma smashes water into ions and electrons. Hydrogen ions are basically protons – here professors of Physics know all this science, back to the 1950s.
5 H++e- ->n0 hydrogen ions and electrons form neutrons
6 16O2-+s n0 ->81H++4e- neutrons bond with oxygen ions, that undergo nuclear fission into 8 hydrogen ions.
7 1H+=r n0 ->Er3+L+X-ray and hydrogen ions are enriched, and fission into heat, light and X-rays
This is Molecular Nuclear Fusion – where we convert molecular hydrogen into energy, light and X-rays. Massive clean and free energy.
Heavy rain does Molecular Nuclear Fusion, forming helium and oxygen ions. The helium carries the positive charge to above the clouds, and the negative charge falls to the ground.
When we get a potential of 5,000 V, we get a partial steam plasma arcing from the clouds to the ground.
It touches down, and we get the up-rush of 100 amps of electrons. This does Molecular Nuclear Fusion
8 H2O+e- ->He++O2-+L+E2+X-ray
Back to MNF. Chick make s5 tonnes of He, every 3 minutes around the world. If we fire up a steam plasma in a glass tube we get different reaction
9 H++e- ->n0 neutron formation
10 16O2-+s n0 ->8H++4e- nuclear fission of oxygen
11 1H++r n0+Tu+P+T ->E3+L+X-ray conversion of hydrogen into Energy etc.. Tu=turbulence
So we get hydrogen fission – into energy. Twice as energetic as H nuclear fusion, which is twice as energetic as uranium fission. Hydrogen fission produces no toxic Pt or Strontium.
And water is basically free. And above 4 atmospheres we found the steam plasma self sustained. Utilising 3cc of regular water to run a 100 MW power station for a decade. Hence the recent slide in oil prices.
Which have not been passed on to the consumer, as this would make fossil fuel burning cheaper than hyper toxic uranium fission.
So if the home user has a 50x1cm steam plasma driving a small steam turbine, for 248 UK pounds he can generate all the power for 8 houses. Using a 100th of a cc of regular water a year.
Generating a Tully massive income. Of 30,000 UK pounds. Burning no coal, oil or gas. And utilising no enriched uranium.
Power with no CO2. Which is not the answer that nuclear wanted. But Molecular Nuclear Fusion knocks uranium fission and fossil fuels burning out of the energy system.
Producing unlimited cheap and clean energy. Even supposedly rational professor talk about 'man-made climate change' as if it was real and thus a problem. Though the world has been cooling since 1995.
Displaying a basic lack of understanding of O level biology and photosynthesis that is incompatible with a job in education.
Such in individuals must be saked, and all their technical papers use as ground fill. There is no man-made climate change. And Molecular Nuclear Fusion is the free energy system of nature.
Any scientist wh orefers to man-made climate change receives a payment from nuclear power: not nice people.